Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Called "The Greatest Human Being" dead.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Called "The Greatest Human Being" dead.

    Monday, September 21, 2009 06:25 PM
    The death of the greatest human being who ever lived
    Andrew Steele

    Norman Borlaug is dead.

    That probably means nothing to most people.

    But Borlaug – along with other researchers who create the Green Revolution in food production – saved between two hundred million people and one billion people, depending on how you do the math.

    Norman Borlaug spent decades with the Rockefeller Foundation in Mexico cross-breeding grain varieties to produce a new disease-resistant dwarf strain of wheat that transformed agriculture, especially in the third world.

    Previously, nations from Turkey to Mexico to India were rocked regularly by crop failures. Too much or too little rain, heat or cold could plunge entire nations into famine, war or revolution.

    In the 1960’s, Borlaug introduced new strains that absorbed more nitrogen and thus grew faster. Previously, plants that grew faster just fell over and rotted, but Borlaug cross bred them with shorter “dwarf” plants with hardy thick stalks that could stand up to high nitrogen absorption. The result was fast-growing, disease-resistant plants perfect for unstable climates.

    He also introduced backcrossing techniques that increased their disease resistance through selective breeding.

    Most importantly, he was focused on using these techniques specifically to alleviate starvation in the developing world. His goal was always to attack famine, not merely to improve margins in agribusiness.

    His impact was immediate and dramatic.

    When his seeds were used widely in 1963, Mexico instantly went from famine-prone to a wheat-exporter. Their wheat harvest was six times greater after Borlaug was done than before he started his work. Imagine the compromised stability of Canada and the United States if Mexico were still endured regular famines threatening the lives of millions.

    Borlaug’s seeds arrived on the sub-continent in 1965 as it was roiling through famine and war. Within five years, the previously starving Pakistan was self-sufficient for grains. India would be self-sufficient within a decade. The two nations were transformed. It is impossible to conceive of the great leaps of Mumbai and Kolkata in an India still experiencing regular famine. Consider the reception of the Taliban in Northern Pakistan if the government could not prevent famine in that region. Food security is a huge contributor to world peace.

    He would go on to introduce new rice strains in China and grains in Africa that would continue to save millions.

    It was conventional wisdom in the 1960s that hundreds of millions would die of mass starvation and no one could do anything about it. Biologist Paul Ehrlich wrote in 1968, "the battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate..."

    Borlaug did.

    His persistence and inventiveness demolished a horseman of the apocalypse. Today, the causes of famine are almost always political rather than weather. The disaster is far less common in the south and virtually forgotten in the developed world.

    For his efforts, Borlaug won the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and was the subject of an episode of Penn and Teller’s Bull**** where he was lauded as the “Greatest Human Being Who Has Ever Lived.”

    Some critics have attempted to argue that Borlaug’s work contributed to the environmental challenges of today, that the population growth of the last forty years contributed to or even caused climate change or resource depletion. Others have decried his invention as “genetically modified food,” which it undeniably is.

    Borlaug himself remained concerned about population growth and resource use. But the reality is that Borlaug’s work was instrumental in saving the hundreds of millions of lives and hundreds of millions of trees. The Borlaug Hypothesis in agronomy states “increasing the productivity of agriculture on the best farmland can help control deforestation by reducing the demand for new farmland.” In other words, you do a better job with what you have and you won’t need to use virgin resources.

    Of his harshest critics Borlaug stated, "some… are the salt of the earth, but many of them are elitists. They've never experienced the physical sensation of hunger. They do their lobbying from comfortable office suites in Washington or Brussels. If they lived just one month amid the misery of the developing world, as I have for fifty years, they'd be crying out for tractors and fertilizer and irrigation canals and be outraged that fashionable elitists back home were trying to deny them these things."

    Borlaug remained grounded despite his elevation to sainthood with the Nobel Prize win. He continued to work in Africa, Asia and Latin America improving crop yields. In 1986, he created the World Food Prize to continue to spark innovation in food production.

    Norman Borlaug died on September 12, 2009, at 95 years of age. His family released a simple statement that “We would like his life to be a model for making a difference in the lives of others and to bring about efforts to end human misery for all mankind.”

    When Princess Diana died, television networks covered it 24/7. Michael Jackson’s passing created a tsunami of Internet traffic. I learned about Borlaug’s passing on the sidebar of a news website on global development issues in foreign policy.

    Norman Borlaug goes to a better place having made the Earth undeniably better, safer and freed from hunger.

    And he goes in virtual silence.

  • #2
    thanks Noel ... I'd never heard of Norman Borlaug before your posting but I know of him know and I checked WikiPedia just to make sure you weren't pulling my leg ... which you are not ...

    so may Norman Borlaug rest in peace - an all round good guy who did an awful lot for the human species ...

    Comment


    • #3
      If it makes you feel any better Noel, his passing made it over here on BBC Radio 4's flagship news program 'Today'. ALong with an article explaining why he might have saved more lives than any other human being.
      They don't miss much on Radio 4.

      Comment


      • #4
        I studied Green Revolution in Geography, didn't know Norman Borlaug was the one who came up with the idea. May him rest in peace.
        2009 Shanghai Roewe Masters Fantasy Game - 1ST RUNNER UP

        Comment


        • #5


          May Norman rest in peace and live in our memories forever.
          Proud winner of the 2008 Bahrain Championship Lucky Dip
          http://ronnieosullivan.tv/forum/index.php

          Comment


          • #6
            R.I.P. Norman Borlaug

            I am going to be contentious here as I disagree with genetic manipulation which this was, I agree it saved untold lives but at what cost and not necessarily direct costs.

            The manipulation of the crops may well have been a plus in many ways but other genetic manipulations are a definate negative but they all come under the same banner and inherantly have the same problems.

            I am no born again christian blah blah blah (nothing against born again christians just a figure of speech, live and let live I say!)

            The world has developed and all things on it for that matter for millions of years and we are changing things in a blink of an eye with no long term data to say if those changes will have a detrimental effect on us or the planet.

            Are we sowing the seeds (forgive the pun!) of our own destruction without realizing it?

            The problem with the areas described with regards to food shortages is well know, too large a population for the land to support thus any climatic adversity is magnified many fold and as a product causes significant deaths through starvation.

            Population control is therfore far better than genetic alteration as eventually you will get to the situation where even genetics can't support the population, we are not curing the problem we are just delaying it.

            Bottom line of our current society is were all right jack sod the future!

            We must become a partner of the planet and work with it to sustain life not rip it to pieces and pillage its none renewable resources.

            I of course am a hypocrite, I drive a car, I use a computer, I eat the genetically modified food, and I don't give it a second thought but that is not for the individual to correct, it is for the governments to correct as it is they that create the rules. This may be said to be passing the buck, its not really its just getting those with the power to use the power they posess for the benefit of all.

            I will of course vote for whichever political party meets the sustainable criteria the best but unfortunately they are all to a greater or lesser degree blind to the future.
            Last edited by bkpaul; 22 September 2009, 10:28 AM.
            All smelling pistakes (c) my keyboard, I can spell but it can't type

            Comment


            • #7
              I understand where you come from bkpaul however there is a man who devoted his life to try and helping the poorest of the poor. It may be that he hasn't done it the best way for our planet's future - time will tell - but he has done it with his heart and the lights he had. Nobody can ask more from any human person.
              Proud winner of the 2008 Bahrain Championship Lucky Dip
              http://ronnieosullivan.tv/forum/index.php

              Comment


              • #8
                Hi Monique,

                I wasn't critisizing Norman I was calling into question the technology / ethics that allows such things to go on. Norman as said saved millions of people from starvation and that is wholly admirable!

                Ultimately though the same principles and technology's lead to genetic designer babies or super human soldiers and as said his work is not a cure its just a delaying mechanism.
                All smelling pistakes (c) my keyboard, I can spell but it can't type

                Comment


                • #9
                  Alas same is true for almost any human invention/discovery. The same techniques that allow us to create vaccines are used to create bacteriological weapons. Guttenberg's invention has been used to spread knowledge and education aswell as ideological endoctrinement, intolerance and hatred...
                  Evil is in the mind of some ... not in science or technologies.
                  Proud winner of the 2008 Bahrain Championship Lucky Dip
                  http://ronnieosullivan.tv/forum/index.php

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    but some science and technologies are more open to evil than others and genetics are in my personal opinion more likely to have global disasterous implications than any other form of technology.
                    All smelling pistakes (c) my keyboard, I can spell but it can't type

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally Posted by bkpaul View Post
                      but some science and technologies are more open to evil than others and genetics are in my personal opinion more likely to have global disasterous implications than any other form of technology.
                      ... all the more reason to embrace potentialities and each of us contribute in our own ways on the journey away from dystopia towards utopia.

                      It is a matter of perspective and vision and faith and hard work to reach that "147" we all want.



                      =o)

                      Noel
                      Last edited by noel; 22 March 2010, 03:51 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        he was a great man and i for one was well aware of who he was but like you not that he had died.
                        https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/adr147

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally Posted by cantpotforshíte View Post
                          If it makes you feel any better Noel, his passing made it over here on BBC Radio 4's flagship news program 'Today'. ALong with an article explaining why he might have saved more lives than any other human being.
                          They don't miss much on Radio 4.
                          Good to know... thank you cantpotforshíte.


                          =o)

                          Noel

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X