A few O'Sullivan fanboys and a few commentators with limited insight into anything other than a green baize have said O'Sullivan is a genius. This guy has won the most important tournament in the snooker calendar 3 times in 16 attempts. Rafael Nadal, whom I have never heard anyone describe as a genius has won the the most important tennis tournament in his year 3 times out of 3. He has never lost a match at Roland Garros. By the way, Nadal is a right handed person and yet has never lost a match playing there playing left handed at all times!
This is also a far more competitive sport. If Nadal isn't described in every sentence as a genius(remembering of course that O'Sullivan invariably is) then there is something wrong with some of these commentators vocabulary.
The difference may actually be that the intellect of tennis commentators far outweighs that of snooker commentators and O'Sullivan fanboys.
This is also a far more competitive sport. If Nadal isn't described in every sentence as a genius(remembering of course that O'Sullivan invariably is) then there is something wrong with some of these commentators vocabulary.
The difference may actually be that the intellect of tennis commentators far outweighs that of snooker commentators and O'Sullivan fanboys.
Comment