Thank you for that ADR147.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GENUINE WILL HUNT PROFESSIONAL 3/4 SNOOKER CUE & Cue Craft Ally Case.
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by paddybhoy30 View PostYou can't expect to charge the same price as say trevor who makes the cue from start to finish as a cue that has been sourced from the far east and rebadged with an well known ex-cuemaker.
EZ" It's impossible to put a price on happiness "...:-) EZ
Comment
-
Originally Posted by ste bed View PostNo just a clever play of words ( stunning example of a will hunt snooker cue this cue is a super example of this highly sort after makers work) implying that it was made by will hunt why don't you clearly state that it was bought in from Thailand and finished by will hunt. I think if you new the truth in the 1st place you wouldn't have bought it either. Your
doing the same thing Dave coutts did to you the only difference is you know the truth where Dave didn't at e time of sale.Tear up that manure-fed astroturf!
Comment
-
If that being the case would it be acceptable for one of picassos work bearing his signature on the painting to have been done by his assistant but just signed by picasso. If this was confirmed the painting would be immediately devalued substantially. This is what is happening with a lot of Andy Warhols works. When this cue was bought it was bought with the understanding that WH himself made the cue. Supposed he indicated on the cue that it was made in another country on the badge. Do you think that he would fetch the prices or have the demand that he now has.Originally Posted by ADR147 View PostWill Hunt is perfectly entitled to do this and the cue is legally a Will Hunt cue, the question of who did what is not really important to the end product the customer buys, surely if Will is happy to put him name to the cue that is what you are paying for? in reality all cues are imported in various levels of build because ebony is not indigenous to the uk.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by sanman View PostIf that being the case would it be acceptable for one of picassos work bearing his signature on the painting to have been done by his assistant but just signed by picasso. If this was confirmed the painting would be immediately devalued substantially. This is what is happening with a lot of Andy Warhols works. When this cue was bought it was bought with the understanding that WH himself made the cue. Supposed he indicated on the cue that it was made in another country on the badge. Do you think that he would fetch the prices or have the demand that he now has.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by ste bed View PostSorry adr147 but that's a load of crap
Comment
-
As u clearly state its a scandal and not acceptable practice. Once people do become knowledgeable they become empowered to make descisions based on that knowledge. Withholding that knowledge whilst not illegal is still unethical and immoral depending on situation. That goes against what is acceptable.Originally Posted by ADR147 View Postin what way, he is breaking no laws? how much stuff that you buy all the time do you think you know absolutely 100% the exact source of, the recent horsemeat scandal should maybe open peoples eyes.?
Comment
-
Originally Posted by sanman View PostAs u clearly state its a scandal and not acceptable practice. Once people do become knowledgeable they become empowered to make descisions based on that knowledge. Withholding that knowledge whilst not illegal is still unethical and immoral depending on situation. That goes against what is acceptable.
Comment
-
As ADR says it's so huge now it's just the way things are in MOST industries, soon as a product becomes BIG it goes from being a cottage industry thing into something a lot larger and who knows where most of the stuff we consume comes from when it's just moved abroad and made by, well ,who knows..
Mr birdseye don't make my burgers or mr kipling probs int never made a cake in his life....
We've probably been eating horse for 20 odd years without knowing, at least with a cue it's still a cue eh...
Comment
-
Originally Posted by sanman View PostAs u clearly state its a scandal and not acceptable practice. Once people do become knowledgeable they become empowered to make descisions based on that knowledge. Withholding that knowledge whilst not illegal is still unethical and immoral depending on situation. That goes against what is acceptable.77 in a match, 97 in a line up
Comment
-
[QUrealityR147;696366]Will Hunt is perfectly entitled to do this and the cue is legally a Will Hunt cue, the question of who did what is not really important to the end product the customer buys, surely if Will is happy to put him name to the cue that is what you are paying for? in reality all cues are imported in various levels of build because ebony is not indigenous to the uk.[/QUOTE]
In reality all cues are imported in various levels because ebony is not indigenous to the uk. Are you having a laugh so in reality Trevor white who I know for fact makes is own cues start to finish cant really say there handmade by him because he doesnt grow his own wood. he takes raw materials and turns them in to a cue. What will hunt / coutts cues did was deceived there customers I know hes entitled to import cues rebadge them and legally call them a will hunt but he should have stated this from the beginning but if he had done that would people have bought them.
Comment
Comment