I weighed a set of cheap pool balls that I use. The results are interesting. This bit will make boring reading but persevere. Ball # then weight in grams:
1: 140.8 (the lightest), 2: 147, 3: 146.4, 4:145.2, 5 145.8, 6:146.3, 7: 148.1 (the heaviest), 8: 141.4, 9: 147, 10: 142.6, 11: 146.1, 12: 145.8, 13:143, 14: 145.2, 15: 146.2, Cue ball 145.5.
So the difference between the smallest and the biggest is 7.3 grams or very nearly a 5.2% difference!
The main thing that this proves is that I have too much time on my hands and should get out more I realise but I do think it is interesting info. I also measured the lighter and heavier balls but there is actually very little difference between them, 1 was 51.7 and the cue ball was the largest at 52.4 so I presume that the differences in weight are due to the density of the material rather than size.
Expect an equally fascinating sequel to this when I weigh my snooker balls.
1: 140.8 (the lightest), 2: 147, 3: 146.4, 4:145.2, 5 145.8, 6:146.3, 7: 148.1 (the heaviest), 8: 141.4, 9: 147, 10: 142.6, 11: 146.1, 12: 145.8, 13:143, 14: 145.2, 15: 146.2, Cue ball 145.5.
So the difference between the smallest and the biggest is 7.3 grams or very nearly a 5.2% difference!
The main thing that this proves is that I have too much time on my hands and should get out more I realise but I do think it is interesting info. I also measured the lighter and heavier balls but there is actually very little difference between them, 1 was 51.7 and the cue ball was the largest at 52.4 so I presume that the differences in weight are due to the density of the material rather than size.
Expect an equally fascinating sequel to this when I weigh my snooker balls.
Comment