Why is it that in 3/4 cue in most companies cues have such a joint that the mini-butt cannot be jointed to the shaft of the cue . I only know that Mike Wooldridge and Peradon do this . Why is it that other cue-makers have not started doing this ? It really helps if the mini-butt joins in the shaft when you are playing in your home table and are just cramped by 3 or 4 inches less space . I had to buy a new short cue for my table because the Mastercue I bought didn't have this option .
Surely it is not more expensive to have a female joint in the shaft such that the mini-butt can join , Its only an added benefit which helps when playing pool or when you are just a little short in snooker / billiards room .I'm sure all you people would agree that such a joint is rather useful
So why is it that all cue-makers have started using this system ? Is there any reason or is it just that they couldn't be bothered ? I mean this won't cause any problems or it wouldn't give proper cueing would it , especially if MW uses it
thanks for sharing anything that you may feel . let us know if you agree or not
:snooker:
Surely it is not more expensive to have a female joint in the shaft such that the mini-butt can join , Its only an added benefit which helps when playing pool or when you are just a little short in snooker / billiards room .I'm sure all you people would agree that such a joint is rather useful
So why is it that all cue-makers have started using this system ? Is there any reason or is it just that they couldn't be bothered ? I mean this won't cause any problems or it wouldn't give proper cueing would it , especially if MW uses it
thanks for sharing anything that you may feel . let us know if you agree or not
:snooker:
Comment