Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Maple or Ash cue

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Just as Acrowat said, go and play. You choose a cue by your heart not by your eyes.

    Comment


    • #17
      On the snooker table, anyone plays smart will look good and the other way round. Think about it.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally Posted by wayync View Post

        but aesthetically speaking the winner has to be maple. I love the way the wood burls especially when you have a nice shiny coat on it with a dark rosewood butt, the contrast is so nice
        Somehow I believe I know exactly what you meant.
        www.AuroraCues.com

        Comment


        • #19
          I say Ash now I am older but Maple as a youngster, I always believe there is more action in Maple and more control in Ash...

          Can't prove it, its just what I believe.

          As a youngster my shots were more flambuoyent hence the Maple helped when I got older, a wiser head told me to calm down and Ash suited that style of play better.
          All smelling pistakes (c) my keyboard, I can spell but it can't type

          Comment


          • #20
            Maple has more a tendency to warp over time ive been told.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally Posted by wayync View Post
              I am having a very very hard time deciding whether or not I want a maple cue or an ash cue. I've tried both and both are wonderful but i still can't decide and it's really bugging me.

              I guess here is what I have come down to so far

              maple: no grainy look, very clean, can hit with different parts of the cue tip as there is usually no one side up (so maybe you would think less about whether the cue is in the right position), whippier so it's better for spins?

              ash: stiffer, has grains for sighting? (i guess if they are perfectly straight) and probably the main reason is because most pros use ash.

              I use a 55.5" cue so i don't know if that may be a factor. The reason why I'm having a hard time is because whatever I choose now, will probably be what i will be using for the rest of my life, so it feels like a huge commitment.

              Excellent question to pose. I am trying to decide myself, as I am in the market for a new weopon.
              Last edited by peeweedogue; 17 February 2011, 07:28 PM.
              Nice pot ! Thank you, but now I have "the munchies"

              Comment


              • #22
                I prefer ash cue
                Hi Im from Israel sorry about my bad English

                Comment


                • #23
                  I have always played with an ash cue, yet funnily enough I've never sighted down the grain.

                  I bought a maple cue and it is simply wonderful. The only problem is it's a bit shorter than I'm used to and is only 57.5 inches, give or take a quarter. It has a slight kink in the end, but can't really tell. All the best cues I ever played with had some small imperfection anyway.

                  All manufacturers should offer a 2 shaft package, where you get an ash shaft 'and' a maple shaft, with the same butt.

                  I'm going to sell the maple cue I have and buy a new one with a bit more length.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    It is confusing me too!

                    I have always played with Ash and am probably going to continue to do so. I have never used the grain for sighting but always had a preferred side and it was all part of my pre-shot routine. I know that some people have commented on the difference in sound too.

                    Good luck whichever path you choose
                    On Cue Facebook Page
                    Stuart Graham Coaching Website - On a break until March 2015
                    Ton Praram Cues UK Price List

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      On the quest for the cue I wanted to keep for life, I used a few handmade & machine spliced ash before switching to maple.

                      I then played with a cheap dufferin cue in maple before an old riley cheap thing. Not EJ riley just riley.

                      Anyway ordered myself a couple of hand made cues in maple and it my opinion maple is so much better.

                      I love the plain looking smoother effect. No feel of grain like there is with ash.

                      In terms of playability, for my low standard or play, I see no difference from maple to ash, each cue whether it be ash, maple or something else can play different.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally Posted by jaffa.johnson View Post
                        On the quest for the cue I wanted to keep for life, I used a few handmade & machine spliced ash before switching to maple.

                        I then played with a cheap dufferin cue in maple before an old riley cheap thing. Not EJ riley just riley.

                        Anyway ordered myself a couple of hand made cues in maple and it my opinion maple is so much better.

                        I love the plain looking smoother effect. No feel of grain like there is with ash.

                        In terms of playability, for my low standard or play, I see no difference from maple to ash, each cue whether it be ash, maple or something else can play different.
                        I said all that Jaffa but it hasn't stopped me bidding on the maple 'Wright' cue that you have on ebay :-) Well I'm assuming it's you.
                        On Cue Facebook Page
                        Stuart Graham Coaching Website - On a break until March 2015
                        Ton Praram Cues UK Price List

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X