If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
As no two cues are the same and will have a completely different hit so your the question cannot be answered. If however you rephrase the question as to who has the highest quality of work and selects best woods, including such things as splicing and finishing. You just might get some kind of answer.
People in this forum always say whether a cue is good or bad depends on whether it suits the individual person. To quite a big extent, I agree but in my opinion, there are also some objective criteria to determine whether a cue is 'good' cue.
In particulars, the quality of wood, the taper, craftmanship, balance etc. If a cue is made by a good cue maker with all these being well mixed, I believe it would be good for most people to play with unless the subjective criteria do not suit the person like the length and weight. People also say one could get used to the cue after some playing which I agree and therefore a 'good' cue would be good for playing for most people.
On the other hand, if the objective criteria mentioned above is bad, although one might occasionally play good with such a cue but in majority, I believe it would limit your range of shots and standard of play.
People in this forum always say whether a cue is good or bad depends on whether it suits the individual person. To quite a big extent, I agree but in my opinion, there are also some objective criteria to determine whether a cue is 'good' cue.
In particulars, the quality of wood, the taper, craftmanship, balance etc. If a cue is made by a good cue maker with all these being well mixed, I believe it would be good for most people to play with unless the subjective criteria do not suit the person like the length and weight. People also say one could get used to the cue after some playing which I agree and therefore a 'good' cue would be good for playing for most people.
On the other hand, if the objective criteria mentioned above is bad, although one might occasionally play good with such a cue but in majority, I believe it would limit your range of shots and standard of play.
have had cues around 500+ now am playing wiv one that cost 195 so u can get good cue at good prices but means going to try the cue out befor u buy it
I have to agree, I'm currently playing with a master craft cue which cost me £120 and it is a good if not better than all the other cues I've owned. However I am still purchasing an ultimate as I want to try one for myself and if I don't like it I can always sell it on.
hav tried 3 maybe 4 ultimates and if am honest thought my paragon was better I wouldn't pay 800+ for one at all the Trevor white cues hav had hav been really good just haven't found one i really like
I think it's a bit odd that the original OP stated a simple question which he was hoping to find an answer to and there was hardly anyone who answered to the point. I'm pretty sure he understand quite well that one cue is not like the other and what's good for one person might not be good for someone else... Is it that hard for someone who tried both a stamford and an ultimate to say which he thinks is a better cue... simple as that
Comment