If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Its tough to keep up with what the pros use, some change so frequently but I think its fair to say 1pc have always been and probably always will be the preferred choice, especially by the very top players. Apart from Williams and Robertson, every winner of the world championships in the modern era used a 1pc cue. Coincidence, I don't think so!
Don't see any advantage of a 3/4 over a one piece other than being marginally easy to transport. No need to have a joint in there otherwise, just more to go wrong, spoil the feel and potentially compromise the balance.
There's definitely a change in feel with metal joints that completely separate the butt and shaft. It has to be that the vibrations are travelling from wood to metal to wood and then finally to you hand.
Its tough to keep up with what the pros use, some change so frequently but I think its fair to say 1pc have always been and probably always will be the preferred choice, especially by the very top players. Apart from Williams and Robertson, every winner of the world championships in the modern era used a 1pc cue. Coincidence, I don't think so!
yes and the format up to a few years before was more along the lines of a challenge format, and would be over 100 + frames played in different venues across weeks.
The knockout format we know today was used from early 70s but again was in different venues.
John Spencer, first ever WSC with a two piece in '77. I 3/4 split my one piece just above the splices ala Mark Williams and although the weight went up an ounce it feels no different, the grain lines up perfectly and it balances right on the tip of the splices as before.
Comment