Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Graeme Dott's Parris Ultimate No.2050

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    yes Andy they are ok speed wise but the up keep of the damn thing's are crazy....
    Not played for 3 years and itching for a game....11-3-2017.

    Comment


    • #17
      graham changed his cue as he wanted his osborne thicker at the tip and got one of the well known cuemakers to do the work for him, he got the cue cut to be thicker and got the length re-spliced similar to what his parris looks but to be honest it was a horrible job that was done on his cue and as yous would of seen at the world he was terrible, had lost all confidence with his osborne cue due to the work done on it. he got 2 parris cues made, 1 was a 3 piece i am sure but he preferred the 1 piece which he is using now, its quite a nice cue, think its got 2 arrows on 1 side and 5 or 6 on the other but graham tends to just play the shot however the cue is sitting in his hand, doesnt bother with grains or which side grain he uses, just plays.

      Comment


      • #18
        So I wonder who this cue maker could be then that made such a shoddy job. I guess as no names have been mentioned I can only assume its someone who possibly frequents this forum and could be damaging to their business if named. Of course I could be totally wrong but it does seem a bit strange to mention the bad job but then no mention of this person.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally Posted by cueman View Post
          So I wonder who this cue maker could be then that made such a shoddy job. I guess as no names have been mentioned I can only assume its someone who possibly frequents this forum and could be damaging to their business if named. Of course I could be totally wrong but it does seem a bit strange to mention the bad job but then no mention of this person.
          no idea - but sometimes these jobs can't be done well, lengthening cues is never good - btw i make it 7 of the 16 with jp cues. which is still way more than anybody else.
          https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/adr147

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally Posted by ADR147 View Post
            no idea - but sometimes these jobs can't be done well, lengthening cues is never good - btw i make it 7 of the 16 with jp cues. which is still way more than anybody else.


            What are the negatives to lengthening a cue?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally Posted by narl View Post
              What are the negatives to lengthening a cue?
              it's not really the same cue once you do. generally better to buy another cue then at least you can go back!
              https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/adr147

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally Posted by ADR147 View Post
                it's not really the same cue once you do. generally better to buy another cue then at least you can go back!


                Would it not depend though on how much its lengthened and how much weight (if any) is added to it? Theres a few players i can think of that have had their cues lengthened, White and Stevens come to mind immediately, White had his H&O lengthened and also his Parris, Stevens cue has also been made longer in the past. Probably more down to familiarity with the shaft more than anything.

                Comment


                • #23
                  but the shaft is not the same - tampering with cues is never a good idea especially lengthening them.
                  https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/adr147

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally Posted by ADR147 View Post
                    but the shaft is not the same - tampering with cues is never a good idea especially lengthening them.


                    Why wouldn't the shaft be the same though if the butt is lengthened?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally Posted by ADR147 View Post
                      no idea - but sometimes these jobs can't be done well, lengthening cues is never good - btw i make it 7 of the 16 with jp cues. which is still way more than anybody else.
                      By my calculations its 9, they being, Hawkins, Trump, Dott, Carter, R'son, williams, Allen, walden and m.Davis.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally Posted by cueman View Post
                        By my calculations its 9, they being, Hawkins, Trump, Dott, Carter, R'son, williams, Allen, walden and m.Davis.
                        Sorry but as Ronnie is currently at number 20 then he does not count !
                        Not played for 3 years and itching for a game....11-3-2017.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Think he meant Robertson
                          "You have to play the game like it means nothing, when in fact it means everything to you" Steve Davis.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally Posted by willtyson View Post
                            Think he meant Robertson
                            silly me...that will teach me to butt in without reading the thing correctly...

                            my apologies.
                            Not played for 3 years and itching for a game....11-3-2017.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally Posted by cueman View Post
                              Still, people will only believe that this JP was a freebee. Of course whether they are or not the majority of players have choices and of the 16 in this tournament from the beginning, 9 used JP cues, not bad for someone who makes the worst cues in the world, uneven splices etc etc.
                              Cueman, I am lucky enough to own a top professionals Parris Ultimate cue and it is perfect in every way. Splicework is spot on, grain straight as can be and five arrows that are perfectly spaced. A pro would be mad to refuse a cue as good as this.
                              Oldgit
                              'Believe To Achieve'

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally Posted by Oldgit View Post
                                Cueman, I am lucky enough to own a top professionals Parris Ultimate cue and it is perfect in every way. Splicework is spot on, grain straight as can be and five arrows that are perfectly spaced. A pro would be mad to refuse a cue as good as this.
                                Oldgit
                                I was being sarcastic in my post, there have been lots of talk recently about poor Parris splices and cues in general and to be honest I'm sick of hearing it. Just because he's not an active member on this site doesn't mean people should continually slag him, and half these people don't even own Parris cues yet still they have an opinion, usually biased towards other cue makers who do use this site.
                                If you have a problem with a cue contact the cuemaker, don't come on here slagging people, that damages reputations and isn't the way to go about any business. This should be made a rule on this site from now on!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X