Same cue, very different listings ( Jason Owen 063 again )

[billabong]

Interesting differences in these listings

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3-4-Jason-...vip=true&rt=nc

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=131158480024

Goes from being broken 1 piece cue, with repair through a new shaft and a joint, to being a rare Jason owen 3/4 cue. . . .

[itsnoteasy]

Naughty !!

[bradwight]

So basically its a Craftsman cue with a Jason Owen butt. The entire business end is made by someone else! Misleading to say the least!

[jb134]

Why would you not clear the kitchen table before taking the photos? Or wipe your lens?

[jrc750]

Why would you not clear the kitchen table before taking the photos? Or wipe your lens?

Because some people are obviously too thick to understand the benefits of good pics

[billabong]

The prequel to this tale is here :-

http://www.thesnookerforum.co.uk/boa...light=owen+063

Poor cue's fairly going through it's owners rather than hitting balls . . . . .

[jlowap]

People are retards

[DeanH]

People are retards

who you calling "people"?

[jlowap]

In general... That's all A lot of the time when selling, people don't think about the negative effect of posting bad images etc... That's all. (Referring to the bad images on the auction)

[bolton-cueman]

I suppose the current seller might not know much about the cue / cues and is 'innocently' thinking its a 'rare' cue, but in reality its a mongrel cue and not worth tuppence ha'ppeny

[bradwight]

Aye but no doubt it'll sell because of the name on the badge to an unsuspecting buyer. Hopefully for whoever buys it, Craftsman will have done a fine job of the new shaft. Still not what it says on the tin though!

[jb134]

Aye but no doubt it'll sell because of the name on the badge to an unsuspecting buyer. Hopefully for whoever buys it, Craftsman will have done a fine job of the new shaft. Still not what it says on the tin though!

The shaft looks ok but the pictures are so poor it's hard to tell.

[billabong]

I suppose the current seller might not know much about the cue / cues and is 'innocently' thinking its a 'rare' cue, but in reality its a mongrel cue and not worth tuppence ha'ppeny

Unless the current seller bought it from the previous e-bayer, in which case he just glammed it up a bit ( a lot ) .
There wasn't much time between the 1st auction being stopped, and the current one starting. .

[cyberheater]

Fraud. Pure and simple.

[jlowap]

I asked the seller and got this reply:

'I think u will find I've owned this cue for the last 13 months with full
receipts to prove'