The original op
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Don't buy a Snooker Cue (or anything else), it's a Conspiracy!
Collapse
X
-
I can agree with the points he's made. Indeed a "master blaster" for those who spending big money on cue.
I've played with a cheap 20gbp cue that made me a good snooker player. I've owned some cues from top cuemakers as well that has no match against a cheap cue.
Likewise I have to say I'm a cue addict so I never stop finding a good cue. Well, if the cue does not feel that good at least some credits for the top craftsmanship
Good advice but still can't stop people like me to continue our strive in finding so called "best" cue LOL
Comment
-
A tip to last 20yrs, a huge joint (there's value in all that brass folks), a lovely rubber bumper and machine splices made by machines, no human errors. Only a fool would spend more on a cue maker's cue and achieve not one jot more than with this Classic, it's all any player needs. Arrows unevenly spaced and turning anti-clockwise down to the shaft. It's just a bit of wood afterall and when you make that 147 with it, you will know that all them fancy-Dan cues are rubbish in comparison.
WP_20150320_22_07_52_Pro.jpgWP_20150320_22_07_22_Pro.jpgWP_20150320_22_07_10_Pro.jpgWP_20150320_22_08_09_Pro.jpg
C'mon ADR, why are you wasting your time selling all that expensive rubbish when you should be selling Classics?Last edited by Master Blaster; 21 March 2015, 08:03 PM.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Master Blaster View PostA tip to last 20yrs, a huge joint (there's value in all that brass folks), a lovely rubber bumper and machine splices made by machines, no human errors. Only a fool would spend more on a cue maker's cue and achieve not one jot more than with this Classic, it's all any player needs. Arrows unevenly spaced and turning anti-clockwise down to the shaft. It's just a bit of wood afterall and when you make that 147 with it, you will know that all them fancy-Dan cues are rubbish in comparison.
[ATTACH]17691[/ATTACH][ATTACH]17692[/ATTACH][ATTACH]17693[/ATTACH][ATTACH]17694[/ATTACH]
C'mon ADR, why are you wasting your time selling all that expensive rubbish when you should be selling Classics?
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Leo View PostSo in a nutshell what you're saying is wether they have talant or not players will have to buy an expensive cue to improve their game and who ever says they can play well with a cheap cue is full of sh*te
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Master Blaster View PostI will send you this Riley Classic, it's only half the cue you've got. Clunk, clunk, clunk.
Comment
-
I think the cue has to have something about it but Ebdon won a world title with A old Riley Dufferin with a big dustbin lid tip on it probably worth less than 200 Stephen Hendry won more than anyone else with a cue costing less than 200 and Murphy won a World and Uk with a old cue that you could probably pick up for a few hundred. So did Higgins and Williams and Ding and crafty Ken used a bent rack cue thing all his life that cost a fiver or less.
These kind of facts above kind of prove the point about cues - it is what suits the player - Of course if Parris gives the top 64 free cues they will use them - don't blame them.
Its nice to own a nice cue costing a lot of money and good luck if you find a cue that looks good and plays nice but its what feels right and what you yourself get used to. That said I just love buying them and trying them cant help myself it is an illness.Last edited by Byrom; 22 March 2015, 03:23 AM.
Comment
-
What kind of standard do you play to Master Blaster?WPBSA Level 2 - 1st4Sport Coach
Available for personalised one-to-one coaching sessions
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact: steve@bartonsnooker.co.uk
Website: www.bartonsnooker.co.uk
Comment
-
My few cents worth of opinion to this...lets be rationale and logical as we are all mature thinking adults.
Its true that skills and hardwork definitely play the biggest part in the overall ability of a player. However, to ignore the quality of the cue and tips definitely should not be overlooked. It helps to lessen your errors as you could do more things with lesser effort resulting in better breakbuilding.
The other disagreement about cheap and rack cues in the olden days i feel should not be equated with todays game. Cue prices have risen up astronomically recently which makes them look so expensive compared to the olden days. Example is will hunt cues. Quality of shaft wood has also changed. Previously, wood used in rack and cheap cues are definitely of much better quality compared to nowadays. Wood is scare and expensive now so we dont even know what kind of wood goes into the making of cheaper cues now.
Standard of snooker has also increased tremendously so its hard to see a person winning with cheap cues against opponents of comparable standard.
Of course, we also need to consider the preferences of a player in choosing his cue. Its no good a cue to the world champion if he were to use a cue with totally different specs and behaviour which might have served another great player well.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by pottr View PostI know I can't pick up any old cue and play with it...
Comment
Comment