Fair play Bill, my bad in forgetting the original post. Yes, under the SoGa JP should have offered what CAB describe:
If it isn’t, you can usually get one of the following:
a repair
a replacement
your money back (a refund)
some of your money back.
JP offered him a replacement or refund. He doesn't have to offer a repair if he deems it uneconomic. JP complied with the law so I fail to understand the customer's beef with JP's service. What's disappointing are the splices lifting to begin with, I can understand the customer's frustration with that, given JP's rep. I guess that the cue arrived through the post because it would have been obvious at JP's shop? It's always a good idea to go to the shop and test the cue, so that JP can address any faults there, that's partly what the shop is for, to test the cue, that's part of the price you pay to JP. However, whoever inspected this cue before packing needs a word.
I'm curious as to the splices, what were they?
If it isn’t, you can usually get one of the following:
a repair
a replacement
your money back (a refund)
some of your money back.
JP offered him a replacement or refund. He doesn't have to offer a repair if he deems it uneconomic. JP complied with the law so I fail to understand the customer's beef with JP's service. What's disappointing are the splices lifting to begin with, I can understand the customer's frustration with that, given JP's rep. I guess that the cue arrived through the post because it would have been obvious at JP's shop? It's always a good idea to go to the shop and test the cue, so that JP can address any faults there, that's partly what the shop is for, to test the cue, that's part of the price you pay to JP. However, whoever inspected this cue before packing needs a word.
I'm curious as to the splices, what were they?
Comment