Some people seem to like new tables. Others like antiques. Which makes are the best for playing on? Can old ones play as well as a modern one? Some modern ones look a bit "cheap" to me when you look at the old ones.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Best tables
Collapse
X
-
Youre table Phil has the best of both modern and old , the frame and slates are around 1930s the cushions which are Riley Aristocrat made around 1999/2000, the pocket openings and wood capping depth plus pocket plates are made for the modern game , the old welsh slates are less prone to distorting unlike modern italian / Brazilian / Potuguese / or even Chinese slate , Welsh and Irish slate in my opinion is the best in the world for Billiard tables , it is a shame that it is just not cost effective to still mine it , there is tons and tons of it left in the ground , the density of Welsh and Irish slate is so much heavier than italian when they are the same thickness .
As billiard fitters world wide will testfy when manhandling them upstairs
Old tables have more muntins under the slate , if the muntins are fitted and planed correct this will support the slates across the width , stopping any deflection or dip in the slate .
Modern tables use an adjustable muntin this is just as good if not better than the old way , but people often remark , they are not made as good , in truth not a lot has changed in design of the frame work , apart from less muntins in preferance to one centre adjustable muntin , they are pretty much the same , look for double bolted frame work , they are much more sturdy , I often look on ebay at modern Riley aristocrats , one way of spotting a good one is the double bolted frame work over the single bolted version , Riley made Both versions ? . plus there are a lot of chinese copies of the aristocrat . some made under license .
Quality of wood is the main differance , a table made out of solid oak or good quality mahogany including those inner muntins is a sign of very good table . today manufacturers would not waste hard wood on muntins most are soft wood .
this is not to say that the old manufacturers would not use soft wood , scotch pine was often used as the inner frame work and also the outer with a veneer over it , why scotch pine , less knotts .
Adjustable slate supports is not a new thing , as you know Phil , youre ridgidous Burroughs and watts frame has two adjustable width ways supports and two planed supports , all these align with the slate joints , a way for spotting these ridgidous B&Watts tables are that the legs are not evenly spaced , the centre legs are closer to the middle of the frame work rather than set 4 legs spaceings equal like most tables .Last edited by Geoff Large; 13 August 2012, 04:43 PM.[/SIGPIC]http://www.gclbilliards.com
Comment
-
I do hope it is "the best of both modern and old" Geoff. Having seen it in a dismantled state I am absolutely itching to play on it. I am due over there in February and hope it will be fully functioning before that.
Originally Posted by Geoff Large View PostYoure table Phil has the best of both modern and old , the frame and slates are around 1930s the cushions which are Riley Aristocrat made around 1999/2000, the pocket openings and wood capping depth plus pocket plates are made for the modern game , the old welsh slates are less prone to distorting unlike modern italian / Brazilian / Potuguese / or even Chinese slate , Welsh and Irish slate in my opinion is the best in the world for Billiard tables , it is a shame that it is just not cost effective to still mine it , there is tons and tons of it left in the ground , the density of Welsh and Irish slate is so much heavier than italian when they are the same thickness .
As billiard fitters world wide will testfy when manhandling them upstairs
Old tables have more muntins under the slate , if the muntins are fitted and planed correct this will support the slates across the width , stopping any deflection or dip in the slate .
Modern tables use an adjustable muntin this is just as good if not better than the old way , but people often remark , they are not made as good , in truth not a lot has changed in design of the frame work , apart from less muntins in preferance to one centre adjustable muntin , they are pretty much the same , look for double bolted frame work , they are much more sturdy , I often look on ebay at modern Riley aristocrats , one way of spotting a good one is the double bolted frame work over the single bolted version , Riley made Both versions ? . plus there are a lot of chinese copies of the aristocrat . some made under license .
Quality of wood is the main differance , a table made out of solid oak or good quality mahogany including those inner muntins is a sign of very good table . today manufacturers would not waste hard wood on muntins most are soft wood .
this is not to say that the old manufacturers would not use soft wood , scotch pine was often used as the inner frame work and also the outer with a veneer over it , why scotch pine , less knotts .
Adjustable slate supports is not a new thing , as you know Phil , youre ridgidous Burroughs and watts frame has two adjustable width ways supports and two planed supports , all these align with the slate joints , a way for spotting these ridgidous B&Watts tables is the legs are not evenly spaced , the centre legs are closer to the middle of the frame work rather than set 4 legs spaceings equal like most tables .王可
Comment
-
Yes, there is a thread somewhere about "refurbished " tables. Plenty of people selling "fully refurbished" tables at prices where you know they cannot conceivably have refurbished them. Mine was done professionally by Rileys but many have just had a coat of polyurethane on the legs and a new cloth!
Originally Posted by NorthWestJunior View PostI'm not too fussed. If I could have any table I'd go for the Star or an Aristocrat but a well refurbished antique table always looks great when done properly.王可
Comment
-
Originally Posted by philip in china View PostYes, there is a thread somewhere about "refurbished " tables. Plenty of people selling "fully refurbished" tables at prices where you know they cannot conceivably have refurbished them. Mine was done professionally by Rileys but many have just had a coat of polyurethane on the legs and a new cloth!
Comment
-
It wasn't luck in my case. I asked Geoff Large to source me a good table. Also I wasn't in a hurry so he had plenty of time to sniff around. I would advise anybody in a similar position to do exactly the same. I think most of us need to admit we actually know little enough about tables and an expert opinion is valuable.
Originally Posted by s.h442 View Posti quess it must be a luck of the draw kind of thing.王可
Comment
-
Playability wise, it's a case of how well maintained the table is, whether it's relatively new or and antique type. I think it's important to have a table that plays to suit the modern game, like Geoff was saying about Phil's table, a good old solid frame and slates that will last, yet setup with modern cushions and pocket plates to suit the style of todays game.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by philip in china View PostMaybe it's because of my age but I really do love the look and feel of deeply polished wood. I also like classic designs. Somehow, and I know this is purely personal, the idea of gold sprayed legs with lights under the table seems too flashy to me.
I did have a Riley TC with the silver legs and obviously now have a golden legged Star. I did wonder how the Star would look like in my snooker room but can honestly state I have no regrets. After the quick brush and polish up the table it sits looking very nice and after having it now for nearly nine month I find the older tables look somewhat bland and boring.
I just think we all seem to think we prefer what we all started playing on, yes, the old traditional club looking tables with no flamboyance..
Jmo, guys...JP Majestic
3/4
57"
17oz
9.5mm Elk
Comment
Comment