There's three and a half, and three and a half, it seems to me....how the hell a ball hit along the rail, still with some momentum, can hit the cushion more than a foot from the pocket and still drop is beyond me. It used to be that if you caught the near cushion, the ball didn't drop. Unless it was just on the jaw, dead weight, and even then it used to rattle.
I haven't seen that for a while, and whatever assurances I might get from people, I still can't help but feel that there's something fishy about it.
Perhaps I'm the only one that thinks fewer frames, played with more 'basketball' like scoring undermines the game. I do though, and i think a move towards ever more accepting pockets, and better table conditions, contribute towards making the game more 'exciting' from a potting perspective, but fundamentally undermines the game as a test of temperament and mental resolve.....and that's where a lot of the drama was.
I haven't seen that for a while, and whatever assurances I might get from people, I still can't help but feel that there's something fishy about it.
Perhaps I'm the only one that thinks fewer frames, played with more 'basketball' like scoring undermines the game. I do though, and i think a move towards ever more accepting pockets, and better table conditions, contribute towards making the game more 'exciting' from a potting perspective, but fundamentally undermines the game as a test of temperament and mental resolve.....and that's where a lot of the drama was.
Comment