Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can anybody put a name on this table

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    So do u all think its a aristocrat table?

    Comment


    • #17
      Can anybody put a name on this table

      Definitely an Aristocrate
      just banter about terms of description
      Up the TSF! :snooker:

      Comment


      • #18
        Could be a Darlington Billiard Co table.Similar style.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally Posted by maryfield View Post
          Could be a Darlington Billiard Co table.Similar style.
          ahhhhh.....
          :biggrin:


          My view is that Riley sold their tables to others and made them for others to rebadge, as mentioned previously a badge is not definitive but can be indicative
          Up the TSF! :snooker:

          Comment


          • #20
            I didn't know that. For whom did they manufacture?
            王可

            Comment


            • #21
              I should have said, this is my view, nothing definitive but from some research I have many makers or a retailers name associated with a table and it is clearly the same as a Riley, or a Thurston, or a B&W model.
              Retailers, understandable but I do think these makers did "sub-contracted" for some other names that possible could not continue making themselves.

              Of course, there is the situation seen many times where another maker has updated a table with, say, their cushions/pockets, and changes the plates. This was quite common, but the first scenario above I think also happened.
              Up the TSF! :snooker:

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally Posted by Geoff Large View Post
                Turned bulbous fluted leg = Aristocrat
                there are some lovely legs around, turned and then calved into. how much does that effect the value geoff, ornate legs means higher end table?

                Comment


                • #23
                  The design you see on the Aristocrat are not as elaborate as most, quite plain in comparison (still possibly my fav though ) and I would not say the Aristocrat was a high end, more mid-level.
                  There are some legs that are works-of-art and would have been high end table but leg design does not necessarily indicate "level".

                  To confuse the thread a bit, it was possible to order an Aristocrat table with a turned straight-taper leg with no fluting or embellishments at all (very 70s).
                  Last edited by DeanH; 7 December 2016, 01:36 PM.
                  Up the TSF! :snooker:

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Mine has very austere square legs, but those suit my taste. De gustibus, non disputandum.
                    王可

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Pretty sure they didn't. Hence the explosion of new companies in the 80's which were needed to keep pace with demand. Some real poor quality tables from this period.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        There certainly were. Of course at the prices at which some of them were churned out they couldn't have been any better.
                        王可

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X