Money money money and greed.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
QSP Series @ South West Snooker Academy-£25,000 prize fund*
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by eminel View PostTHE PRIZE IS ONLY FOR PLAYING SNOOKER....................WHAT ABOUT THE ACCOMODATION THAT THE YOUNG PLAYERS WILL HAVE TO FIND THOUSANDS OF POUNDS NOT TO MENTION FOOD AND TRAVEL. VERY MISLEADING NOT ALL PARENTS WILL NO ABOUT THE HIDDEN CHARGES THAT WILL COME WITH MOVING TO THIS VENUE.
Originally Posted by eminel View PostMoney money money and greed.www.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
I forgot to add also eminel, that the Academy is a company set up to be limited by guarantee. That means that any profit we do make is all donated to charity. This really is not a project for personal financial gain. It is simply a project for satisfaction in working within an industry which we enjoy! It seems some people find that difficult to believe!www.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
well i hope you do lookafter the players. only time will tell. the thing is your getting£64000 in entry fees and paying out £25000+ this has never sat well with snooker players and im sure when all the players find out they will have some strong views on this. BUT ALL IN ALL SOME TOURNAMENTS TO PLAY IN IS BETTER THEN NO TOURNAMENTS AT ALL.
Comment
-
I think you've answered his points excellently Sarah. I used to organise tournaments, and found players expectations of what gets paid in and out are farcical.I often use large words I don't really understand in an attempt to appear more photosynthesis.
Comment
-
The Academy's QSP series has to be looked at in context. It is a means of having a £1000 entry paid for World Snooker main Q-School event. That event offers NO prize money, the only 'prize' being 12 places up for grabs on next season's Main Tour. If they get 300 entries then that's £300,000 straight into the coffers of World Snooker, for which they are paying out a mere fraction of that in direct costs associated with the event.
In comparison, what the Academy is offering is far more generous, and having seen the facilities on offer at Gloucester, it's well worth the money for those who believe they have a good chance of qualifying for next year's Main Tour. Even if they don't qualify, the lucky winners from QSP will surely gain an advantage in their own NGB tournaments?
For those (in England) who think that £500 really is a bit steep, then maybe they should consider EASB's Q-School Satellite events, initially marketed as 'turn pro for a tenner' because it cost just £10 to enter stage 1. Stage 1 has already come and gone, but entries are now being taken for Stage 2 at just £40 a time, and you can enter up to three times (at £40 a throw) to improve your chances. Stage 2 is being held in three regions: north, south and midlands. The lucky 8 qualifiers from each region will then go through to Stage 3, which others can enter at £100 a time (again up to three entries), the eventual winners having their £1000 entry fee paid for them for World Snooker's Q-School event. The number of places at stake will be dependent on the level of entry fees received: for every £2500 entry fees, one £1000 entry fee to Q-School will be paid.
Comment
-
I accept that you have a high class facility,my concerns are still that your going down the road of using these tournaments to subsidise a facility that looks to me has very little chance of breaking even.
It may well be that snooker needs your academy,but i still feel the amount of money your taking away from the players entry fees is not justifiable.Obviously time will tell if the players will support you,my gut feeling is that your going to have to find some other means of funding.
One more question which may be unfair or hard to answer but do the well known players who are managed by you pay the same fees for practice etc. and if they dont should young amateur players be subsidising the likes of Jimmy White.
Comment
-
One more question which may be unfair or hard to answer but do the well known players who are managed by you pay the same fees for practice etc. and if they dont should young amateur players be subsidising the likes of Jimmy White.[/QUOTE]
very good question but i dont think you will be getting a honest answer.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by eminel View Postwell i hope you do lookafter the players. only time will tell. the thing is your getting£64000 in entry fees and paying out £25000+ this has never sat well with snooker players and im sure when all the players find out they will have some strong views on this. BUT ALL IN ALL SOME TOURNAMENTS TO PLAY IN IS BETTER THEN NO TOURNAMENTS AT ALL.
Originally Posted by magicman View PostI think you've answered his points excellently Sarah. I used to organise tournaments, and found players expectations of what gets paid in and out are farcical.
Originally Posted by Souwester View PostThe Academy's QSP series has to be looked at in context. It is a means of having a £1000 entry paid for World Snooker main Q-School event. That event offers NO prize money, the only 'prize' being 12 places up for grabs on next season's Main Tour. If they get 300 entries then that's £300,000 straight into the coffers of World Snooker, for which they are paying out a mere fraction of that in direct costs associated with the event.
In comparison, what the Academy is offering is far more generous, and having seen the facilities on offer at Gloucester, it's well worth the money for those who believe they have a good chance of qualifying for next year's Main Tour. Even if they don't qualify, the lucky winners from QSP will surely gain an advantage in their own NGB tournaments?
Again, as someone who has visited the facility and has experience in organising tournaments, your comments are greatly appreciated.
Originally Posted by the legend View PostI accept that you have a high class facility,my concerns are still that your going down the road of using these tournaments to subsidise a facility that looks to me has very little chance of breaking even.
It may well be that snooker needs your academy,but i still feel the amount of money your taking away from the players entry fees is not justifiable.Obviously time will tell if the players will support you,my gut feeling is that your going to have to find some other means of funding.
One more question which may be unfair or hard to answer but do the well known players who are managed by you pay the same fees for practice etc. and if they dont should young amateur players be subsidising the likes of Jimmy White.
As for your last question, it is not unfair and we are more than happy to answer it. Paul has answered that in a previous post though so I won't repeat what he has already said!
Originally Posted by eminel View PostOne more question which may be unfair or hard to answer but do the well known players who are managed by you pay the same fees for practice etc. and if they dont should young amateur players be subsidising the likes of Jimmy White.
Happy to answer and an honest answer it was indeed. It's no problem being honest if you have nothing to hide
Another note, away from these quotes, this will be the fourth tournament we have held at the Academy. The first, the Pink Ribbon was a charitable event and cost £20 to enter. The second, a World Open Qualifier which cost £20 to enter. The third, EPTC4 which cost £100 to enter although that entry fee was determined by World Snooker and not us. This tournament is priced in accordance with the reason it was set up in the first place.www.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
Sarah - the more I learn about your venture the more i admire what you have set out to achieve. I have been to Gloucester and can commend the facility, the staff and the layout. People need to realise that you have to give in some way in life to yield the reward, you guys have given a lot.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by ryanc147 View Postsounds like a great event just a shame that it clashes with two events from the EASB q school events, and the first event clashes with the prem junior tour where most of the top amateurs are likely to be.
Thanks for your comments regarding the QSP. As a player who has used the facilities at the Academy and who this series is aimed towards it is nice to hear your thoughts. We had been looking to change the date of our first event to allow people to enter after Xmas and if that means we will avoid clashing with the Premier Junior Tour then that is all the better. We were awaiting confirmation from those who had already entered that they were happy to change, which they are.
The new dates will therefore be:
Event 1 - 21-23 January
Event 2 - 4-6 February
Event 3 - 18-20 February
Event 4 - 18-20 March
We did originally clash with two of the EASBs Q school satellite events which resulted in us changing our dates in order to avoid a clash. I have now noticed however that the EASB have changed the date of stage three of their Q School satellite resulting in it now clashing with our event 3. The EASB calendar we used to get our dates had stage three of the Q School Satellite being played on 2nd-3rd April. As we do not have any other weekends that would be suitable, we are going to go ahead with our original date for event three.
Hopefully see you at the Academy again soon Ryan.
Many thanks,
Sarahwww.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
-
Originally Posted by bazp310 View PostSarah - the more I learn about your venture the more i admire what you have set out to achieve. I have been to Gloucester and can commend the facility, the staff and the layout. People need to realise that you have to give in some way in life to yield the reward, you guys have given a lot.
Thanks againwww.onqpromotions.co.uk
www.southwestsnookeracademy.com
Comment
Comment