Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EXCLUSIVE SS Article 1 - Barry Hearn’s rescue offer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EXCLUSIVE SS Article 1 - Barry Hearn’s rescue offer

    It is not Snooker Scene’s practice to divulge our contents in advance but the upcoming WPBSA AGM on December 2 is so important for the game’s future that we make an exception. We are grateful to The Snooker Forum’s help in this regard.

    Pages 3-7 of our December issue report that Barry Hearn is ready to make himself available as WPBSA chairman if the present chairman, Sir Rodney Walker, fails to be re-elected on December 2.

    Snooker Scene believes that it is vital that Walker, along with two other directors presenting themselves to the AGM, Jim McMahon and Mike Dunn, do not achieve re-election.

    We are therefore releasing five pages of Snooker Scene December in the hope that they will contribute to the debate and possibly even sway some votes in the 72 man electorate to make it possible for Hearn to be given the chance to give snooker the new start is desperately needs.

    Clive Everton, editor, Snooker Scene


    Barry Hearn’s rescue offer
    Publishing as we do on the first Wednesday of each month, we are unable to bring you the result of a meeting on that very day, December 2, that will determine, in essence, whether snooker acquires a new lease of life or continues to flounder.


    We refer to the World Profession Billiards and Snooker Association’s annual general meeting at which three of its five board members, Sir Rodney Walker, its chairman, Jim McMahon and Mike Dunn, present themselves for re-election on a straight yes or no vote of the electorate of 72.


    If the noes prevail, it will leave a board of only two, Lee Doyle of 110sport and Hamish McInnes, unknown to most players, who was introduced by Walker after Sport England deemed him surplus to requirements in its middle management.


    Pressure on Walker, already apparent in recent months, intensified with a declaration that Barry Hearn would be prepared to replace him.

    Walker offered himself for re-election at the AGM a year earlier that he need have done in a move tantamount to requesting a vote of confidence so that he could remain in position for a further two years.

    Since nominations for election to the board closed on June 30, Hearn could not have offered to stand at this stage.

    I would, of course, only consider this with the backing of the players,” said Hearn. “If the players decide they are happy with the way things are at present and they re-elect Sir Rodney I would of course respect that decision and continue to do all I can to create playing opportunities through existing channels.”

    Hearn’s Matchroom organisation promotes the Premier League, which is shown on Sky, and the Championship League, an event delivered exclusively to subscribing betting websites.

    Although he has remained Steve Davis’s friend, manager and business partner, Hearn is not as central a figure in snooker as he used to be and until now has resisted approaches to make a return to the sport.

    Under his chairmanship of the Professional Darts Council, darts has been immensely successful. He is chairman of Leyton Orient and is deeply involved in the promotion and televising of several sports.

    His special talent has always lain in identifying and exploiting niche markets, famously darts but including pool and tenpin bowling, angling even.

    I am not currently looking for, neither do I need to take this step. However, I do believe that there has never been a better time for expansion of the game and it would be a challenge I would relish,” he said.

    Hearn has the backing of the Snooker Players Association, a new union that WPBSA refuses to recognise.

    Its spokesman, Pat Mooney, manager of John Higgins, the world champion, said: “The SPA has over the past months used all routes available to present the wishes of the membership with little success. We believe there must therefore be either a change of thinking or a change of personnel within the [WPBSA] board to ensure the development of the game is in the proper hands.”

    Mooney added that, if Hearn becomes chairman, his first priority would be to conduct a root and branch review of “the whole structure and potential of the game on a global basis.”


    In the event of Walker, McMahon and Dunn failing to be re-elected, the rump of the board could in theory flout the wishes of the membership by not taking up Hearn’s offer to become chairman and appoint a board of his choosing, a privilege extended to Walker when he came into snooker.


    However, in this eventuality, an EGM could be called at which the majority who voted to oust the incumbent trio would no doubt be prepared to oust Doyle and McInnes as well.

    All this constitutes a unique opportunity fir professional snooker – in all probability its last chance for a generation – to halt a decline, extensively documented by Snooker Scene not just in this issue but over many months and even years.


    But, to return to basics, the prospect of much needed change may, even as you read this, have proved a cruel mirage if players vote in sufficient numbers to support a regime with a record of proven failure and nothing to offer but yet another promise of jam tomorrow.


    This regime might have felt that it could count on 13 votes from players attached to the 110 camp and a couple from those whose managements have paid positions at the WPBSA’s academy in Sheffield (the accounts for which have never been published to the membership).


    Gatherers of proxy votes like Dunn himself and the amazingly tall coach, Del Hill were expected to have been just as assiduous in this election on behalf of the establishment as they have successfully been in the past.


    Hopefully, our January issue will be able to report the exit of the old guard and the arrival at the helm of a man with a relevant record of success not just in negotiating deals but, notably in the case of darts, creating structures that benefit all levels of the game.


    Hearn has not been shy of declaring how much money he has made from darts but as the players have been enriched and fairly treated too, no one seems to have begrudged him this.


    This most astute of commercial operators realises that sport is not just about money. It is about creating opportunities, keeping players busy with events and imposing his cheerful, inclusive attitude in such a way that everyone has a good time.


    Contrasting this prospect with the buttoned up, secretive, instinctively excluding attitude of WPBSA as we know it, the December 2 election ought to have produced a landside of proxies against Walker and his colleagues but the good sense of players in the mass, as the Altium debacle of 2002 demonstrated, can never be taken for granted.

  • #2
    Nobody begrudges anybody making money as long as the people they are representing are making a living also.
    The present Board could take what they wanted if there was guaranteed earnings for all professional players - and I mean earnings not pocketmoney - plenty of Tournaments across both Professional and Amateur circiuts and sponsorship and endorsement opportunties for all players.
    How the current Board can take so much money from the game when you have "professional" snooker players having to work to earn a living is a disgrace!

    Comment


    • #3
      Agreed Walker needs out, but we need some sort of manifesto surely from Hearn before he takes control.

      I am sure I speak for a lot of people who are worried where it would leave snooker's unique position on terrestrial TV.

      Time for cards on the table Mr Hearn surely

      Comment


      • #4
        Would Hearn's manifesto include reducing the Tour to 64 or, heaven forbid, 32 players over the next few years?

        What sort of opportunities would this give young players/emerging amateurs to qualify for the Tour, if any?

        Would Hearn be able to keep the BBC contract, and the millions that come with it?

        MW

        Comment


        • #5
          Reducing ther number of players on the tour would be a big mistake. More frequent events, more ranking events, like in tennis, is what is needed.

          I was speaking to a well known player the other week and he was telling about how long it is in-between tournaments now, and that keeping in practice is tough. The Pro Challenge has helped fill the gaps.

          My one worry with Hearn is the future of snooker on terrestial TV. There are many people who cannot afford subscriptions to SkySports or even Eurosport. Losing terrestial coverage wouldn't be good for the game in my opinion.
          Cheers
          Steve

          Comment


          • #6
            Sadly, it is true that very often voting members, at a pivotal crossroads and with their livelihoods at stake,
            will go with the Devil They Know rather than the Devil They Thought They Used to Know But Now Don't...

            The apathetic voter turnout in the past is also hardly encouraging for the prospect of change.

            What exactly would the members be voting on anyway?







            =o\

            Noel

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally Posted by decwes View Post
              Agreed Walker needs out, but we need some sort of manifesto surely from Hearn before he takes control.
              Well, we surely need to know Hearne's action plan on snooker revival, otherwise I don't see why anyone should be voting for him at all, not knowing what will be gains and the costs for the game, the players and the public.
              ZIPPIE FOR CHAIRMAN

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally Posted by April madness View Post
                Well, we surely need to know Hearne's action plan on snooker revival, otherwise I don't see why anyone should be voting for him at all, not knowing what will be gains and the costs for the game, the players and the public.
                Mar... it's gotten to the point where change is necessary if only for changes sake.

                A CHANCE for CHANGE!
                Yes we all want the best outcome for our sport but we KNOW that ain't gonna happen with Sir "Angelo della Morte".

                It's at the "Anybody BUT Bush" point.

                We have learned from the mistakes of the past and it's time to move on into 2010 and beyond.

                Hearn may be able to do that but, but OK, give him a short leash to start, and let's see.

                I just hope the Members take this "Once in a Career-time Opportunity" to vote on behalf of their own well-being and future.



                =o)

                Noel

                Comment


                • #9
                  As I've said before, electing anyone else to the board and chairmanship couldn't possibly make things any worse. To make it worse than it is now there would have to be a reduction in the number of ranking tournaments and also another one would be as mentioned in this string, a reduction in the number of professional players.

                  The people making those comments have abviously never read the SPA's stated objectives which is 'to INCREASE the number of ranking tournaments world-wide' and also 'to provide MORE opportunities for players wishing to turn professional and to increase the professional ranks and make it more international'.

                  I was asked by Pat Mooney, the founder of the SPA and John Higgin's manager, to write a letter regarding the state of snooker in Canada, how to improve on that and also any ideas from Canada on how to INCREASE the number of international professionals.

                  With the authority and backing of the Canadian Billiards & Snooker Association I responded with these possible ideas:
                  1. Give pro tour tickets to either the semi-finalists or even the quarter-finalists in the World Amateur Championships rather than just one pro ticket as we have now.
                  2. Increase the number of tour pros to 128 (which wouldn't increase the number of preliminary rounds from what's presently held) and allocate each country with a number of tour vacancies and then have each country hold amateur ranking tournaments for those players interested in joining the pro tour. It wouldn't matter if those players were not good enough to reach say the last 32 of a ranking even as the best players would come through anyway but it would eventually give the pro tour a more international flavour as some of these players would eventually become good enough to reach the televised stages.
                  3. Give Canada back the pro ticket we used to get for our national champion. This year it would have been Alain Robidoux (back-to-back 140's in the finals of the Canadians) and last year it would have been Kirk Stevens and I believe both of these gentlemen would have taken up the challenge to re-join the tour.
                  4. Find and promote international companies for sponsorship and get ranking events held (last 16 on let's say) and televised in those countries where snooker is getting popular or has been popular, like Canada, Germany, Thailand, any populous mid-East country, United States perhaps to name just a few.

                  I'm certain there are some people out there with better ideas than myself and I believe Barry Hearn and Steve Davis are two of them. When Barry was Steve's manager they were playing all over the world promoting the sport in the 1980's. These international trips included China and United States.

                  What has Barry Hearn done lately that would give someone the idea that he would reduce the number of tournaments on the pro circuit and reduce the number of the pro ranks? I believe his history has shown exactly the opposite and he is just as interested as the SPA is in promoting this sport of ours internationaly (witness the World Series events). Also, listen to Steve Davis' comments regarding snooker and what it needs. He has ALWAYS promoted more tournaments, more players and in the long run a chance for a professional snooker player to make a decent living from SNOOKER, rather than having to drive a taxi or work in a butcher's shop.

                  And remember, his appointment to Chairman of the WPBSA would only be good for 2 years and in that 2 years in order to get re-elected he would have to manage the pro sport in a way which encourages the players to vote for him the next time he is up for re-election, just like any other politician although they normally get 4 or 5 years to royally screw things up!!!!

                  There, I've had my say and I'm sticking with this until I see Barry or Steve totally mess things up and I hope they get the chance to prove snooker can be run much more efficiently and effectively, especially for the players in general whether they be amateurs or already professionals.

                  Terry
                  Terry Davidson
                  IBSF Master Coach & Examiner

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As long as Barry Hearn comes out and states that he would have no intention of reducing the main tour to 64 or 32, i think that players would elect him should the current board be ousted. The trouble being, Big Del Hill, nice fella that he is, has such a large, loyal following of players, that if he decides that this is not in the players best interest, the majority of players are likely to listen to him.

                    I think it would be beneficial for all involved if Hearn and Hill got together and had a good discussion, and see what they can come up with, and get 'Big Del' on side.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      At this point of events it is foremost the question should the game be run by the present 3 executives (2 in the board are funnily kept out of the vote), or not? Taking into account their misachievements my answer is simply 'no'. What will then follow is an interesting, but not a vital question on 2. December. Kicking them out would thus be just a first step. I believe we would see the further steps being benificary to the game as well...
                      Last edited by miscuehamburg; 24 November 2009, 11:18 PM. Reason: speling
                      Ten reds and not a colour...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally Posted by madman View Post
                        As long as Barry Hearn comes out and states that he would have no intention of reducing the main tour to 64 or 32, i think that players would elect him should the current board be ousted. The trouble being, Big Del Hill, nice fella that he is, has such a large, loyal following of players, that if he decides that this is not in the players best interest, the majority of players are likely to listen to him.

                        I think it would be beneficial for all involved if Hearn and Hill got together and had a good discussion, and see what they can come up with, and get 'Big Del' on side.
                        sound advice.
                        https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/adr147

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Reducing the tour to 64 might be the best way to boost prize money. Much of the tour are just making up numbers, they don't really contribute to the game but they draw an income from it. I know that sounds harsh, but the tour should perhaps be at least limited to players who can challenge for titles or have the potential to do so.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            hearn or no hearn the board needs to go.

                            as for the tour size - the more sucsessful the game is the bigger the tour will be - simple economics.
                            https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/adr147

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally Posted by Templeton Peck View Post
                              Reducing the tour to 64 might be the best way to boost prize money. Much of the tour are just making up numbers, they don't really contribute to the game but they draw an income from it. I know that sounds harsh, but the tour should perhaps be at least limited to players who can challenge for titles or have the potential to do so.
                              What a dreadful thing to say - all of the players on the MT have worked hard to get there and are talented players - even those on Pios are!
                              I don't know about "drawing an income" - I would bet most outside Top 32 hardly cover their membership and expenses.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X