Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ding destroys Williams

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ding destroys Williams

    DING Junhui eased into the final of the Grand Prix after crushing a disappointing Mark Williams 6-1.

    Ding who had already accounted for Matthew Stevens and Stephen Maguire took full advantage of the numerous chances offered up by Williams who once again missed a high percentage of easy pots that gifted at least four frames to his younger opponant.

    Yet it looked as if Williams was going to dominate after he capitalised on a break off shot from Ding where the cue ball failed to make the baulk cushion. Lining up the loan red available Williams rolled it in deadweight it into the top corner pocket and proceeded to make a clearance of 142.

    But if anyone thought that was to be an ominous signs of things to come for Ding they would have been scratching their heads from the ridiculous number of pots missed by Mark in a scrappy frame two - not least a black of it's spot. How costly that proved as Ding without ever really scoring that heavily himself managed to accrue enough scraps in terms of points to leave in front 49-18 as they came to the colours, and despite jawing a frame ball final red grabbed the fourth chance Williams threw him sunk the final red and cleared up with 29 to level at 1-1.

    Williams had first chance in the third frame but bizarrely after having the cueball on a piece of thread in the first frame just seemed to switch off mentally as he missed an easy red to the centre when well placed on 19. Striding to a inviting table Ding distached a red to the corner and proceeded to ram in a clearance of 103 to lead 2-1.

    Mark clearly hadn't recognised the warning signs as the fourth frame started as he left Ding the sight of a long red to the top corner pocket and made 31 before chossing to keep the pressure on the Welshman by playing safe. Unfortunatley it didn't quite make the baulk cushion and Williams countered with 27 before his jinx of missing easy balls of the spot struck again- this time the black. And he was left to sit and suffer as Ding mopped up the final red and slammed in the yellow to move two frames clear at the interval.

    Williams badly needed to stop the rot but his safety play was letting him down and once agin he was left to rue the tactical side of his game in frame five as he caught a red much too thinly and pushed a redd towards the centre pocket. It was reasonably potable for Ding, but still a fine cut. With the most delicate of shots Ding dropped the red in and made 28 only to run out of position. But Ding couldn't kill the frame off and allowed Williams in. But it was to cost him only six points before a missed yellow from the Welshman all but handed the frame to his opponant. Sinking an easy yellow Ding then made sure of the frame by rolling in the green.

    Williams had to knuckle down if the match was not to fizzle out in the manner it was threatening to do. And after getting in with an easy chance amongst the balls he promptly threw Ding a golden chance of his own when he missed a simple red to the corner. Ding could hardly believe how many chances he was getting from Williams and he was starting to suffer the same disaease that was affliicting Mark - namely missing easy pots. This time it was a red along the side cushion that was his undoing as he faltered on 20 leaving Mark in at close range. Wlliams knew he had to make the most of this opportunity. But once agin he was to fail when overcut a black to the corner to falter on 32. With the scores poised on 38-46 in favour of Williams the frame came down to the colours and a safety battle ensued. Eventually Mark left the yellow close to it's pocket and Ding droppedit in from distance and then snookered Mark on the green behind the brown- with the pink blocking the chance of swerving around it. On the second time of asking Mark managed to escape but soon found himself under pressure with Ding holding the whip hand in the safety battle after knocking in the green. The Chinese star then slammed in the brown only to leave the blue sitting over the corner pocket. With the white under the top cushion and the blue dead straight Mark lined up his shot. The blue never threatened the pocket and worse still the double kiss sent the blue across the table to the "green" pocket. With the blue at his mercy Ding made no mistake and then sunk a straight pink to lead 5-1.

    Given a chance when Ding left his safety short of the baulk line Willims made 35 before missing an easy red to the centre. That was to be the last shot of the match as Ding drilled in a mid range red and wrapped up a resounding victory with a break of 85 to book a clash with Neil Robertson in the final.

    Suzy Jardine

  • #2
    I've asked this before, but why do people insist on giving away results in the thread title?

    Thanks to the title you gave this thread, you've completely ruined the late-night snooker viewing I had planned. I've been out all evening so didn't see this live, but it was one of the matches I was looking forward to most.

    What would have been wrong with 'Ding V Williams post match discussion'? At least then I could simply avoid the thread until after I'd watched the match!
    "Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"

    Comment


    • #3
      Erm, I'm reporting on the tournament- and have been since Saturday last week- doing exactly the same:snooker:

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally Posted by Billy View Post
        I've asked this before, but why do people insist on giving away results in the thread title?

        Thanks to the title you gave this thread, you've completely ruined the late-night snooker viewing I had planned. I've been out all evening so didn't see this live, but it was one of the matches I was looking forward to most.

        What would have been wrong with 'Ding V Williams post match discussion'? At least then I could simply avoid the thread until after I'd watched the match!
        I know exactly what you mean Billy, and I really do feel for you!

        However I have come to the conclusion it's best to just avoid the forum if you don't want to know any recent results....

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally Posted by footygirl View Post
          Erm, I'm reporting on the tournament- and have been since Saturday last week- doing exactly the same:snooker:
          And what has that got to do with how you title the threads?
          "Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally Posted by checkSide View Post
            I know exactly what you mean Billy, and I really do feel for you!

            However I have come to the conclusion it's best to just avoid the forum if you don't want to know any recent results....
            Thanks very much, checkside. The thing is, though, I only use this forum during tournaments, as I like to discuss matches and take part in the general chit-chat that surrounds them.

            I would never ever give a match result away in a thread title. It's so bloody inconsiderate!
            "Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally Posted by Billy View Post
              I've asked this before, but why do people insist on giving away results in the thread title?

              Thanks to the title you gave this thread, you've completely ruined the late-night snooker viewing I had planned. I've been out all evening so didn't see this live, but it was one of the matches I was looking forward to most.

              What would have been wrong with 'Ding V Williams post match discussion'? At least then I could simply avoid the thread until after I'd watched the match!
              I must admit to agreeing with you, Although the articles are great to read after the match (all credit for them btw Suzy) I too have come to the conclusion to completely avoid the forum if I am planning to watch the late night highlights. Also found out the hard way lol!
              sigpic A Truly Beakerific Long Pot Sir!

              Comment


              • #8
                the title is misleading Ding did not distroy williams.......williams contributed to his own downfall by following a brilliant 142 break with pants snooker that was not befitting a ranking semi final.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally Posted by Billy View Post
                  I've asked this before, but why do people insist on giving away results in the thread title?

                  Thanks to the title you gave this thread, you've completely ruined the late-night snooker viewing I had planned. I've been out all evening so didn't see this live, but it was one of the matches I was looking forward to most.

                  What would have been wrong with 'Ding V Williams post match discussion'? At least then I could simply avoid the thread until after I'd watched the match!
                  look use common sense don't go on snooker forums if you don't want to know results before highlights.

                  this is a forum on up to date snooker as it happens therefore in future don't log on then everyone is happy.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally Posted by wildJONESEYE View Post
                    look use common sense don't go on snooker forums if you don't want to know results before highlights.

                    this is a forum on up to date snooker as it happens therefore in future don't log on then everyone is happy.
                    Look, I'm not going to avoid this place during a tournament - it's the only time I post. How difficult can it be to word the title of a thread so that it doesn't give away the result? That's all I'm asking, for Pete's sake!
                    "Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Suzy has put in a lot of time and efforts to give us all here wonderful reports. don't you think this is a bit rude and inconsiderate to critize her this way?

                      If you have missed the match on live, there are many forums and sites whereas you will see the results being discussed. You cannot blame others for reporting who won a tournament after the tournament is over. They also post pictures of the champion holding the cup--should they have delayed releasing that picture and report until you have watched the match?

                      For example, if I have missed the world championship last year and I want to watch it now, can I be mad at anyone who told me or wrote who the world champion was last year? How about calling the person who posted the picture of the world champion inconsiderate? I dont think so.

                      Suzy has always stated who won the match in her reports, such as "shaken but not stirred by Bond"...etc.

                      People do that with other official reports on other sites as well.

                      I have missed the match, too, and I am very happy to hear that Ding has won. Thank you for the detailed report, much appreciated.
                      Last edited by poolqjunkie; 11 October 2009, 04:09 AM.
                      www.AuroraCues.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Well, considering this is a snooker forum, and the people are discussing the results, Ding vs Williams match report seems useless.. Let's say you connect to a sports website, eurosport,espn,etc.. Would you expect to get such a title for a review? I know you try to avoid the match result, but then you should not enter the forum before you watch the record of it..

                        I agree with wildJonesEye, Suzy.. The title is a bit misleading, chances were there to take for Mark, but he just was not in the mental shape of a win.. But the review's first sentence is a good explanation, as Mark was disappointing when amongst the balls..
                        All the way Mark J!!

                        I understand nothing from snooker. - Dedicated to jrc750!

                        Winner of the German Masters 2011 Lucky Dip

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally Posted by Billy View Post
                          Look, I'm not going to avoid this place during a tournament - it's the only time I post. How difficult can it be to word the title of a thread so that it doesn't give away the result? That's all I'm asking, for Pete's sake!
                          how do you word a title if someone wants to ask.

                          Was player A Lucky to beat player B ?

                          some might conform to what you want but theres a lot of members on here and some might word a title in a way to annoy you just because you asked them not to.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            perhaps "Ding Vs Williams - the result"

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X