A few days ago I was quite shocked by a comment my brother made! he said "I was watching your mate Matthew play Snooker yesterday, he played really well, shame he did not win"
Saying that I had to sit down and take a breath is a understatement, my brother is not a Snooker fan and has never watched a match unless I am round his house and I have put it on the TV so this statement was really shocking to me.
As it turns out he has watched quite alot of the Snooker this week because of the quick fire format of best of 5 frames, before this week he could only name two Snooker players, Ronnie O'Sullivan and Jimmy White and he only knows Ronnie's name because of the publicity caused form the press conference in China a few years back and in fact he refers to Ronnie as nosh boy!
Now my brother can name at least a dozen players and even has a decent understanding of the rules.
As it turns out a few of my friends and family who never watch the Snooker have been drawn in this week, 5 of the 6 people I called today who I know never watch the Snooker have said that they have watched at least 3 matches this week, will this make them watch other tournament? maybe but another comment made by my brother makes me believe that they will not, he said "I would watch more matches if they were 5 or 6 frames but that best of 19 stuff they do is just boring, watching quick matches is fun, just as you think it is going to start being boring you go make a cup of tea and when you get back there are different people playing"
From my point of view I have not really watched too much this week because I would like to see longer matches, the best of 5's is too much like a lottery and the players who need a few frames to warm up are just not getting a chance where as they would in a best of 9 but I have watched the matches that I knew would be good entertainment, White, Williams, Stevens, Gould, Hendry etc
So my conclusion for the format is that it is a good one and will bring more people into watch, will be interesting to see what the TV ratings are like after the event finishes.
Saying that I had to sit down and take a breath is a understatement, my brother is not a Snooker fan and has never watched a match unless I am round his house and I have put it on the TV so this statement was really shocking to me.
As it turns out he has watched quite alot of the Snooker this week because of the quick fire format of best of 5 frames, before this week he could only name two Snooker players, Ronnie O'Sullivan and Jimmy White and he only knows Ronnie's name because of the publicity caused form the press conference in China a few years back and in fact he refers to Ronnie as nosh boy!
Now my brother can name at least a dozen players and even has a decent understanding of the rules.
As it turns out a few of my friends and family who never watch the Snooker have been drawn in this week, 5 of the 6 people I called today who I know never watch the Snooker have said that they have watched at least 3 matches this week, will this make them watch other tournament? maybe but another comment made by my brother makes me believe that they will not, he said "I would watch more matches if they were 5 or 6 frames but that best of 19 stuff they do is just boring, watching quick matches is fun, just as you think it is going to start being boring you go make a cup of tea and when you get back there are different people playing"
From my point of view I have not really watched too much this week because I would like to see longer matches, the best of 5's is too much like a lottery and the players who need a few frames to warm up are just not getting a chance where as they would in a best of 9 but I have watched the matches that I knew would be good entertainment, White, Williams, Stevens, Gould, Hendry etc
So my conclusion for the format is that it is a good one and will bring more people into watch, will be interesting to see what the TV ratings are like after the event finishes.
Comment