I think going from a 20's breaker to a 80's breaker is a easier step than from a 80's breaker to a consistent 80's breaker--from a consistent 80's breaker to a consistent 100's breaker is another tough step. Some people stay being a 60-80's breaker all their life, and never become a 100's breaker. At least for me this is what I am working on.
If you can make 60's to 80's, is it safe to assume that you know most of the angles...then what is stopping you from going to becoming a regular 100 breaker?
Personally, although I have made centuries but that is not my average performance. I am talking about consistent century breaks. I think cue ball control, knowledge, and a wider range of shots perhpas is what make that difference? If so, then these all come down to solid fundamentals, especially the ability to be able to deliver the cue striaght and to strike the cue ball precisely.
When i think of my own game, yes, I miss shots but more often my breaks ended with me missing posiitons. Sometimes it is because I am not comfortable performing certain shots with certain stroke(stun, for example, is more comfortable for me than tops..etc), sometimes it is just that I misjudged the angle of the ball coming off the cushion or off my objetc ball. Sometimes I simply chose the wrong shot, and other times I have no clue what to do...
With that in mind, I think it is only logical to say that an aiming system can not be the ultimate solution to making a player a century breakers as stated no matter how revolutionary it may be.
Of course I am sure a better aiming system would help anyone who has had problem aiming. i am just saying it cannot, in my opinion, be the ultimate solution to make someone a regular century breaker.
If you can make 60's to 80's, is it safe to assume that you know most of the angles...then what is stopping you from going to becoming a regular 100 breaker?
Personally, although I have made centuries but that is not my average performance. I am talking about consistent century breaks. I think cue ball control, knowledge, and a wider range of shots perhpas is what make that difference? If so, then these all come down to solid fundamentals, especially the ability to be able to deliver the cue striaght and to strike the cue ball precisely.
When i think of my own game, yes, I miss shots but more often my breaks ended with me missing posiitons. Sometimes it is because I am not comfortable performing certain shots with certain stroke(stun, for example, is more comfortable for me than tops..etc), sometimes it is just that I misjudged the angle of the ball coming off the cushion or off my objetc ball. Sometimes I simply chose the wrong shot, and other times I have no clue what to do...
With that in mind, I think it is only logical to say that an aiming system can not be the ultimate solution to making a player a century breakers as stated no matter how revolutionary it may be.
Of course I am sure a better aiming system would help anyone who has had problem aiming. i am just saying it cannot, in my opinion, be the ultimate solution to make someone a regular century breaker.
Comment