I never said he didn’t have a dominant eye, I just asked how he came to this conclusion. I might be right of base here but I was always taught that the way to determine if you have dominant eye, was to get down and address the que ball as to play a shot, then close one eye and look at where your cue is aiming, then close the other eye and see where you’re aiming. If you aim at the centre of the cue ball your sighting is correct and no adjustment is necessary. If not you have to adjust your stance to suit.
Is this not correct method of determining a dominate eye? It doesn’t make sense to say that because I read some letters of a chart in opticians and was told that one eye was dominant over the over that this would translate into your stance. In an opticians you are looking forward with your head level. When in the stance position you are bending down with your head raise and at angle to your body your eyes are also raised and at angle.
Is this not correct method of determining a dominate eye? It doesn’t make sense to say that because I read some letters of a chart in opticians and was told that one eye was dominant over the over that this would translate into your stance. In an opticians you are looking forward with your head level. When in the stance position you are bending down with your head raise and at angle to your body your eyes are also raised and at angle.
Comment