No, not how tall you are and how much you weigh, but how one shapes up for the shot. I've noticed that Ronnie is chest over the line of the shot. Others, like Judd, appear to be shoulder over the shot. Shoulder over the shot makes sense for power and long potting, but chest over the shot makes sense to me for break building. When I go chest over the shot, with my right nipple touching the cue, I've noticed that I seem to see more of the ball, by that I mean that I'm seeing the ball symetrically, sighting with both eyes, so the ball appears to be fuller. The greatest players of all time (Ronnie, Davis, Hendry) are all said to sight symetrically, so this is something I'm trying to have a go at. Having always been right eye dominant, this isn't easy to get used to, I have to make a conscious effort to stare at the ball with my left eye, but it can be done. The other route is cue down one side of the chin and using the naturally favoured eye. However, when the chest is over the ball, the shoulder to cue hand line is now kinked. By this I mean that the upper arm and lower arm are no longer in the same plane, with the upper arm no longer in line with the cue and shot, but protruding by virtue of the shoulder being to the right of the cue line. This makes putting the cue through straight a wee bit more difficult, whereas with shoulder over the cue, the line is natural and straight, so straight cueing is easier. I guess it's horses for courses again, and it comes down to personal preference.
Any thoughts gents?
Any thoughts gents?
Comment