Was thinking about coaching today and I was thinking, snooker seems to be the only thing, where people don't mention the hours and hours of practice involved in getting better.
It seems that people go for coaching, the coach points out obvious problems in their game, they correct them during that one hour coaching session, and then expect that now they're a 70 break player.
There is absolutely no substitute for hours and hours of practice. Coaching will point out errors and point you in the right direction, but then it requires enormous amounts of practice while doing the correct things to improve.
If I went for piano lessons, and then after that, only played the piano for 3 hours all week after, I'd be rubbish on the piano. But this mindset seems different in snooker. It seems people want the coach to say "right, put your right arm here" and they're now a century break player.
I'm rambling now.
Thoughts?
It seems that people go for coaching, the coach points out obvious problems in their game, they correct them during that one hour coaching session, and then expect that now they're a 70 break player.
There is absolutely no substitute for hours and hours of practice. Coaching will point out errors and point you in the right direction, but then it requires enormous amounts of practice while doing the correct things to improve.
If I went for piano lessons, and then after that, only played the piano for 3 hours all week after, I'd be rubbish on the piano. But this mindset seems different in snooker. It seems people want the coach to say "right, put your right arm here" and they're now a century break player.
I'm rambling now.
Thoughts?
Comment