subconsciously suggests it's nothing to do with the cue
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Helping side
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by itsnoteasy View Posthttp://www.tudou.com/programs/view/bjZXkLm2Ykc/
If you can be bothered, 1 hr 39 mins into this video Jack Karnehm talks about throw and how using side " throws the object ball into the pocket"
It's not the fastest loading site so it takes a bit of patience.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostSigh.
Throw when using english is as accepted as draw is when using bottom. This is not a debate and your opinion is bollox.
Get some education and stop embarrassing yourself. There is a wealth of information out there on the physics of pocket billiards if you are unable to see it for yourself when playing.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by DandyA View Postyes but it's well known that Jack Karnehm only said that because he was selling low deflection cuesMy favourite players: Walter Lindrum (AUS), Neil Robertson (AUS), Eddie Charlton (AUS), Robby Foldvari (AUS), Vinnie Calabrese (AUS), Jimmy White, Stephen Hendry, Alex Higgins, Ronnie O'Sullivan, Dominic Dale and Barry Hawkins.
I dream of a 147 (but would be happy with a 100)
Comment
-
Originally Posted by j6uk View PostOriginally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostSigh.
Throw when using english is as accepted as draw is when using bottom. This is not a debate and your opinion is bollox.
Get some education and stop embarrassing yourself. There is a wealth of information out there on the physics of pocket billiards if you are unable to see it for yourself when playing.
You do need a LOT of side, far more than you'd use routinely, and the larger, heavier balls of american pool produce more spin than the smaller and lighter english pool or snooker. Interesting, if you only use a little side, you get what is called 'gearing', which negates all throw, i believe.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Ramon View PostOriginally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostSales? Christ...
Auto-adjusting = adjusting automatically, or subconsciously. Sorry if that was confusing for you.
I know, this is a conversation between you and J6.
but this is a forum and sometimes people ask questions.
I hope you don't mind!!
I'll appreciate it if you explain this ,,,
Did you see the recent itv documentary on jimmy white, where he said he was completely self trained and had no idea HOW he potted balls, he just learned the game as he played? Today, thanks to hardcore physics nerds like dr dave, we now know how the balls interact upon contact in ways players from the past simply couldnt do. High speed video allows us to see exactly whats happening and shows us how the eye can deceive us.
The question is, is it better to know, or is ignorance bliss? I would advise venturing into this territory only if you're a hardcore nerd with too much time on your hands. Otherwise, let the brain take over.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by jonny66 View PostJust a little note, my question was answered about 15 pages ago, it's running side (outside english to be precise). Could you not start another thread called the infernal debate about sidespin, or something like that. Just so future forum searchers don't have to wade through pages and pages of arguments to find an answer?This is how you play darts ,MVG two nines in the same match!
https://youtu.be/yqTGtwOpHu8
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostLol! A self adjusting cue is a great idea, you'll make a fortune. Get dr dave to shill it for you
Did you see the recent itv documentary on jimmy white, where he said he was completely self trained and had no idea HOW he potted balls, he just learned the game as he played? Today, thanks to hardcore physics nerds like dr dave, we now know how the balls interact upon contact in ways players from the past simply couldnt do. High speed video allows us to see exactly whats happening and shows us how the eye can deceive us.
The question is, is it better to know, or is ignorance bliss? I would advise venturing into this territory only if you're a hardcore nerd with too much time on your hands. Otherwise, let the brain take over.
I like to know . But I think overall ignorance is bliss . Whenever I ask really good players in the club how they play a certain shot or about their technique , most of them just give a rye smile and say " dunno how , I just do it ".
Comment
-
Well shoot me down too then.
I think pedantic stroke is correct with his posts - the ball does squirt or throw off - otherwise you could just imagine a plant position for every ball - this method works better on close to the pocket type shots and is why I don't like the ghost ball technique as a fully reliable method.
This imagine a plant method does not work at distance plain ball on cuts because you have a moving ball hitting a stationary one - and it will hit it thick - I find adding a touch of helping side which I do do naturally when I play does aid these cuts.
There is geometry involved - 90 degree rule for example - but not necessary to master all of it perhaps as it could confuse and harm your natural flow - but people will search for short cuts to improving all the time - I think the best way you pick out a potting angle is by playing that angle over and over and storing it to your memory banks.
I told one poster on here if you do the line up and miss a shot do it again three times until you pot it three times and store the angle in your memory.
Minimal side is good and hitting plain ball but you should also endeavour to experiment too as these other shots do come into the game.Last edited by Byrom; 13 December 2014, 01:43 PM.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View PostI think j6 and a couple of others have it exactly right. Most players will use too much side when it's only necessary to go just outside the centre of the white in most cases and if you use the correct minimal side then 'ignorance is bliss'.
TerryThis is how you play darts ,MVG two nines in the same match!
https://youtu.be/yqTGtwOpHu8
Comment
Comment