Originally Posted by rimmer10
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Aiming/Sighting Consistency
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by itsnoteasy View PostI must say in your last few posts you have killed this nonsense stone dead for me Terry, good posts.
Terry is nothing but a straw man. If he needs help putting me on ignore I'll provide detailed instructions. Straw manning is a common tactic on here i have noticed. If people could stick to things i HAVE said, rather than inserting their own hackneyed nonsense, spin and manipulation, that would be nice.
Now, who is going to answer the central condundrum? Why, when pool is so easy, aren't the top 50 ranked players all failed snooker pros?
Pool is easy, innit?
Comment
-
Originally Posted by winphenom View PostOmaMiesta..i admire you for your forthright and honesty in giving your thoughts about both games and the courage and perserverance to switch over and learn it. Hope you do well unlike people who are so stubborn and unreasonable. So adamant about their thoughts even when others admit both games have their own strengths. So clear that snooker is harder to master but have to argue till the cows come home for nothing.
But seriously, it's myopic, hypocritical, snivelling drivel of the highest order. You're another lacking the reasoning skills to understand this one.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostThey are dreadful posts. He doesn't get it at all.
Terry is nothing but a straw man. If he needs help putting me on ignore I'll provide detailed instructions. Straw manning is a common tactic on here i have noticed. If people could stick to things i HAVE said, rather than inserting their own hackneyed nonsense, spin and manipulation, that would be nice.
Now, who is going to answer the central condundrum? Why, when pool is so easy, aren't the top 50 ranked players all failed snooker pros?
Pool is easy, innit?
But I agree with you, 'pool is easy, innit?' but without the rolleyes
TerryTerry Davidson
IBSF Master Coach & Examiner
Comment
-
Originally Posted by DG GIBERT View PostOriginally Posted by vmax4steve View PostBig Shot is on his own with this argument and that speaks volumes.
Myself, I think english billiards is the harder game as you have to control three balls instead of two on a 12 X 6 foot table. The masters at this game make it look really easy but sure as hell it isn't. I won my local leagues billiards competition once, beat an old bloke in the final by simply potting what I could, making the obvious cannons, potting his cue ball and double baulking him. The following year I made the final again, against a bloke from exeter who was new to our league, and a pure billiards player, and I didn't get a look in.
It was a joy to watch him control those three balls whereas I could only control two; he made fifty plus breaks everytime he went to the table and I was beaten inside an hour, first to 500 and I only scored about thirty.
I hope I haven't started another argument of snooker verses billiards, but the likes of Joe and Fred Davis and Rex Williams were pretty damn good at both games, both John Spencer and Alex Higgins played billiards when younger but concentrated on snooker alone as pros. I think Steve Davis dabbled with billiards as well when he was younger.
If you want to learn good safety play for your snooker then the odd game of billiards will help enormously.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOJE_odeNRk
That's the reasoning here, isn't it? Or have i misunderstood? It's almost as if people are blindly defending the game THEY play, without any consideration for the skill set required for other cue sports. Surely not?!
Comment
-
Originally Posted by j6uk View Postlook how uniform all the responses are with doubling up of the quotes, big pocket is a pro-troll give up
TerryTerry Davidson
IBSF Master Coach & Examiner
Comment
-
Originally Posted by vmax4steve View PostBig Shot is on his own with this argument and that speaks volumes.
Myself, I think english billiards is the harder game as you have to control three balls instead of two on a 12 X 6 foot table. The masters at this game make it look really easy but sure as hell it isn't. I won my local leagues billiards competition once, beat an old bloke in the final by simply potting what I could, making the obvious cannons, potting his cue ball and double baulking him. The following year I made the final again, against a bloke from exeter who was new to our league, and a pure billiards player, and I didn't get a look in.
It was a joy to watch him control those three balls whereas I could only control two; he made fifty plus breaks everytime he went to the table and I was beaten inside an hour, first to 500 and I only scored about thirty.
I hope I haven't started another argument of snooker verses billiards, but the likes of Joe and Fred Davis and Rex Williams were pretty damn good at both games, both John Spencer and Alex Higgins played billiards when younger but concentrated on snooker alone as pros. I think Steve Davis dabbled with billiards as well when he was younger.
If you want to learn good safety play for your snooker then the odd game of billiards will help enormously.
If this was thebilliardsforum circa 1936, there would be hundreds of people piling in on someone daring to suggest snooker is as difficult as billiards, and would be sneering triumphantly at the very suggestion a mere snooker player could ever be a better cueist than Walter lindrum. Show them ronnie o'sullivan in full flight and they would dismiss his game as a mere parlour trick. They KNEW. They couldn't be told.
They would see the issue solely through the prism of their own experience, and be completely ignorant of and indifferent to the viewpoint of others, even when their experience of other games was limited.
What it boils down to is pride and stupidity. People think they suck at snooker because the game is the hardest. They are wrong. They suck at snooker because they suck, period. Whether the game is snooker, billiards, russian pyramid, pool or whatever, is irrelevant. They are all equally difficult.Last edited by Hello, Mr Big Shot; 30 December 2014, 10:11 PM.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostI'm not so alone as you think. Sounds like you yourself are finally seeing the light. There is hope for you yet, lad.
If this was thebilliardsforum circa 1936, there would be hundreds of people piling in on someone daring to suggest snooker is as difficult as billiards, and would be sneering triumphantly at the very suggestion a mere snooker player could ever be a better cueist than Walter lindrum. Show them ronnie o'sullivan in full flight and they would dismiss his game as a mere parlour trick. They KNEW. They couldn't be told.
They would see the issue solely through the prism of their own experience, and be completely ignorant of and indifferent to the viewpoint of others, even when their experience of other games was limited.
What it boils down to is pride and stupidity. People think they suck at snooker because the game is the hardest. They are wrong. They suck at snooker because they suck, period. Whether the game is snooker, billiards, russian pyramid, pool or whatever, is irrelevant. They are all equally difficult.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Hello, Mr Big Shot View PostI'm not so alone as you think. Sounds like you yourself are finally seeing the light. There is hope for you yet, lad.
If this was thebilliardsforum circa 1936, there would be hundreds of people piling in on someone daring to suggest snooker is as difficult as billiards, and would be sneering triumphantly at the very suggestion a mere snooker player could ever be a better cueist than Walter lindrum. Show them ronnie o'sullivan in full flight and they would dismiss his game as a mere parlour trick. They KNEW. They couldn't be told.
They would see the issue solely through the prism of their own experience, and be completely ignorant of and indifferent to the viewpoint of others, even when their experience of other games was limited.
What it boils down to is pride and stupidity. People think they suck at snooker because the game is the hardest. They are wrong. They suck at snooker because they suck, period. Whether the game is snooker, billiards, russian pyramid, pool or whatever, is irrelevant. They are all equally difficult.
Vmax you've seen the light bud !! let me know how re the conditions in other side !! I might be joining you !!
Comment
Comment