getting through the ball

[Philthepockets]

once again repeating

Wow you got through all those scientific articles pretty quick, I am impressed.

[Philthepockets]

once again repeating

do you ignore the science your doctor subscribes to when you are sick?

[golferson123]

Correct views, you mean? Peer reviewed, scientifically proven views? Those sort of views?

How about that those that propagate myths and falsehoods, or quote fat dave down the dog n duck? Should he be repeating those views?

thats exactly what you do, and who are these (peers)? and any quotes i make are my OWN that is why i am comfortable making them i dont need to search out others

[golferson123]

Wow you got through all those scientific articles pretty quick, I am impressed.

no i mean you are repeating, others views

[golferson123]

do you ignore the science your doctor subscribes to when you are sick?

only if i know more than the doctor!

[barrywhite]

no my evidence is playing the game, making cues, not googling rubbish, it hurts me to see the things you write along with others of your ilk that quote these things as facts when real knowledge is earned not just repeated

Spot on, I will bow to you wise sage, obi-wan-kenobi of the baize.

[Philthepockets]

no i mean you are repeating, others views

I am repeating that these are not my views I simply accept the science and in practice once you understand it it all becomes clear and makes sense. It explains many things about why players with the most unorthodox technique still manage to get results, knowledge is power.

[golferson123]

To be fair, this is really new to the snooker world. It took me a long, long time to get my head around what really happens when balls collide.

Who are you on 'the other place', then?

you sir are very condescending, you have no idea of the research and testing that even cue makers of the early years did, the very fact it took you a long long time speaks volumes

[Philthepockets]

you sir are very condescending, you have no idea of the research and testing that even cue makers of the early years did, the very fact it took you a long long time speaks volumes

lol Many English cue makers still don't even know what deflection is.

[itsnoteasy]

but they are not just saying that! they are saying that if you hit the ball at the same speed with any cue that are the same specs the results are identical!

Now that's a different ball game altogether lol, I must have missed that post. I agree you will get variation of hits from every cue even with the same specs. I thought it was shots played with the same cue.

[barrywhite]

lol Many English cue makers still don't even know what deflection is.

You're a muppet. Cue makers like MW have developed their own ferrules to correct throw. Deflection really is a pool boy term. Your pool sticks are stiff maple with a huge 3oz joint in the middle to ruin any feel the wood had left. What's you high break at snooker then, what are you qualifications in physics?

[barrywhite]

I am repeating that these are not my views I simply accept the science and in practice once you understand it it all becomes clear and makes sense. It explains many things about why players with the most unorthodox technique still manage to get results, knowledge is power.

Of course they're not your views, you aren't a scientist, you have no qualifications in science or engineering! Did you know that 20% of research papers are made up, did you know that 30% of science papers turn out to be false positives/negatives? Did you know that most researchers make huge assumptions or as we say ceteris parabus, so they can reduce the explanatory factors to a few variables that can be modelled? Because they can't model every variable? And that's exactly what they can't do, model every variable that occurs in a snooker shot, so they reduce it to F, M and A for the simple folk. What they're explaning is probably only 50% of the truth.

[Philthepockets]

You're a muppet. Cue makers like MW have developed their own ferrules to correct throw. Deflection really is a pool boy term. Your pool sticks are stiff maple with a huge 3oz joint in the middle to ruin any feel the wood had left. What's you high break at snooker then, what are you qualifications in physics?

only by finding out 20 years after Predator figured out what squirt is.
pray tell what the point of a high break cock measuring contest is, do you mean on video or hearsay?
yours truly Kermit

[barrywhite]

only by finding out 20 years after Predator figured out what squirt is.
pray tell what the point of a high break cock measuring contest is, do you mean on video or hearsay?
yours truly Kermit

Life is experiential, you can either play snooker or you can't. If you can you'll understand the importance of getting through the ball and the relevance of tips, chalk, grip, acceleration to the development of spin. If you're a pool boy wacker, there's really no hope.

And you still haven't elucidated your background in physics either.

[Philthepockets]

Life is experiential, you can either play snooker or you can't. If you can you'll understand the importance of getting through the ball and the relevance of tips, chalk, grip, acceleration to the development of spin. If you're a pool boy wacker, there's really no hope.

And you still haven't elucidated your background in physics either.

Please provide your peer reviewed evidence for your claims.
Yous truly
Kermit