Hi all,
I've found that, as some have noted on this forum already, I sometimes have a tendency to steer the cue to the left by steering the grip hand to the right when using the chest to guide the cue (four points of contact). I've been dealing with this since I first started playing snooker three years ago and it's improved somewhat but it's still a persistent problem. I recently found that I cue straight more consistently when I use only the bridge, chin, and grip (three points of contact), though it definitely feels less snug and stable. I've tried varying the cue pressure on my chest, to no avail. Thus, as a stickler for rules and textbook fundamentals, I have a few questions:
1. At what SPECIFIC point should I stop bothering trying to obtain "perfect textbook technique" and just go with what comes to me more naturally? The rest of my technique, stance, and form is very textbook and it all works out fine but I cannot for the life of me get the chest contact to work out consistently (some days it's great, some days steering is terrible). As I said, I've tried to work on the cue steering for a long time now but it's getting to the point where trying to fix it has severely hampered my short run progress. For example, I keep ending breaks early due to me worrying excessively about my chest-cue steering, subsequently resulting in a miss due to resultant tension in the arm.
2. Are there any examples of high level snooker players that I might be able to watch on YouTube that only play with three points of contact (bridge, chin, grip specifically) rather than four points of contact? I understand all the pros nowadays basically use four points of contact, so maybe top amateur players or pro players from before the 2000s?
3. Can I eventually get to a century break standard with three points of contact if I practice enough? My high break right now is low 40 (made with four points of contact). I find I am very unnatural when it comes to sports in general - I've always been bad with hand-eye coordination, visual memory, and depth perception. I simply find snooker more difficult than most so I'm not sure if my play would be hampered in the longer run by choosing less-than-textbook technique. I haven't ever encountered a decent level snooker player that hasn't used four points of contact so I'm terrified that if I go down the no-chest path I'll never emerge from the struggle of practicing like four-five times a week for years a decent player.
I've found that, as some have noted on this forum already, I sometimes have a tendency to steer the cue to the left by steering the grip hand to the right when using the chest to guide the cue (four points of contact). I've been dealing with this since I first started playing snooker three years ago and it's improved somewhat but it's still a persistent problem. I recently found that I cue straight more consistently when I use only the bridge, chin, and grip (three points of contact), though it definitely feels less snug and stable. I've tried varying the cue pressure on my chest, to no avail. Thus, as a stickler for rules and textbook fundamentals, I have a few questions:
1. At what SPECIFIC point should I stop bothering trying to obtain "perfect textbook technique" and just go with what comes to me more naturally? The rest of my technique, stance, and form is very textbook and it all works out fine but I cannot for the life of me get the chest contact to work out consistently (some days it's great, some days steering is terrible). As I said, I've tried to work on the cue steering for a long time now but it's getting to the point where trying to fix it has severely hampered my short run progress. For example, I keep ending breaks early due to me worrying excessively about my chest-cue steering, subsequently resulting in a miss due to resultant tension in the arm.
2. Are there any examples of high level snooker players that I might be able to watch on YouTube that only play with three points of contact (bridge, chin, grip specifically) rather than four points of contact? I understand all the pros nowadays basically use four points of contact, so maybe top amateur players or pro players from before the 2000s?
3. Can I eventually get to a century break standard with three points of contact if I practice enough? My high break right now is low 40 (made with four points of contact). I find I am very unnatural when it comes to sports in general - I've always been bad with hand-eye coordination, visual memory, and depth perception. I simply find snooker more difficult than most so I'm not sure if my play would be hampered in the longer run by choosing less-than-textbook technique. I haven't ever encountered a decent level snooker player that hasn't used four points of contact so I'm terrified that if I go down the no-chest path I'll never emerge from the struggle of practicing like four-five times a week for years a decent player.
Comment