Okay i have decided to (change the rules slightly) from that of 'The Masters', as on reflection the rules may have come across as somewhat unfair - apologies wildJONESEYE & mick142.
I was thinking about (if no one manages to predict the correct no of centuries, then the nearest too either under or over the actual amount would be the winner). Though say if the number of centuries made was 20, and we had four predictions of 19 and three of 21 we could end up having 7 winners in total. IMO having so many winners would devalue the contest.
So instead, the winner/winners will be the one who (predicts the correct number of centuries made) at the 2010 Welsh Open.
If anyone has any better ideas in regards to the rules, then feel free to air them as i'm open to suggestions. If not then the rule will stand for this and future tournaments.
Please can you post your predictions before start of play on Monday 25th January at 1pm.
My prediction is: 15
Good luck to everyone!
I was thinking about (if no one manages to predict the correct no of centuries, then the nearest too either under or over the actual amount would be the winner). Though say if the number of centuries made was 20, and we had four predictions of 19 and three of 21 we could end up having 7 winners in total. IMO having so many winners would devalue the contest.
So instead, the winner/winners will be the one who (predicts the correct number of centuries made) at the 2010 Welsh Open.
If anyone has any better ideas in regards to the rules, then feel free to air them as i'm open to suggestions. If not then the rule will stand for this and future tournaments.
Please can you post your predictions before start of play on Monday 25th January at 1pm.
My prediction is: 15
Good luck to everyone!
Comment