Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Qualifying

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally Posted by DeanH View Post
    I would say Eurosport has nothing to do with the selection of the matches, but that would be the Tournament Director and officials - that is not to say the officials do no also think which match would be "better" for TV.
    Many times I scratch my head on the TV selection, but often they do get it right...
    My thinking of their selection criteria order for a session:
    1. Big Name (V. heavy weighting)
    2. High rank (high weighting)
    3. New face/youngster/"not normal" country (default)
    4. Others (negative)

    obviously, if you have a match with both 1 & 2, makes decision so much easier all round :wink:
    [purely my opinion and for a laugh ]
    i'd get that during r o sullivan time , less so in qualifiers , ws seem to be a bit all tits and superficiality , judd trump and his prize money yawn , i find trump quite dull , i'd hardly get off my bum to go over and watch him even if i was at a venue
    Last edited by trains; 24 July 2020, 05:51 PM.

    Comment


    • This is my first time watching Patrick. Great to see him and also adr's branding on his waist coat. Superb.
      Last edited by fkhan; 24 July 2020, 07:05 PM.

      Comment


      • Come on Frazz!!!!
        Up the TSF! :snooker:

        Comment


        • Originally Posted by DeanH View Post
          I would say Eurosport has nothing to do with the selection of the matches, but that would be the Tournament Director and officials - that is not to say the officials do no also think which match would be "better" for TV.
          Many times I scratch my head on the TV selection, but often they do get it right...
          My thinking of their selection criteria order for a session:
          1. Big Name (V. heavy weighting)
          2. High rank (high weighting)
          3. New face/youngster/"not normal" country (default)
          4. Others (negative)

          obviously, if you have a match with both 1 & 2, makes decision so much easier all round :wink:
          [purely my opinion and for a laugh ]
          I would be very surprised, if the tv channels (probably BBC though and not Eurosport) wouldn't have a part in the decision, which match(es) they show. It's always so in sports.
          It has always been a problem, that they rather choose prominent names over equal matches of good players. But this is not a sole mistake in snooker, it's this way as well in other sports, for example tennis.

          Comment


          • Originally Posted by trains View Post

            they should just ask viewers to vote on the choice of match , or just go with obvious choices , what are they trying to prove as people can watch players like amiri on youtube anyway .
            I like that idea of voting on the tv match.
            This is how you play darts ,MVG two nines in the same match!
            https://youtu.be/yqTGtwOpHu8

            Comment


            • Frazz was very unlucky that last frame, Ken stealing it on the black, let's hope he can get a couple of frames off Ken after the interval
              Ronnie O' Sullivan seven times the record breaking Snooker Master

              Comment


              • Yes, unlucky in the first as well. Hope he grabs the next couple to get himself going

                Comment


                • Common Frazz.

                  Comment


                  • Decent scoring from jamie clarke , good tactical player , the late willie thorne said he needed to score more , seems to have taken his advice , hopefully he gives joe perry a decent game

                    Comment


                    • Peter Lines must be gutted 5-1 up and loses !

                      and not a great day for the Lines family with Oliver losing 6-2 to Gerard Greene . I thought he was really going to make a name for himself in the game , but not so far .
                      Still trying to pot as many balls as i can !

                      Comment



                      • Is someone at snooker.org having a laugh , it says the first 2 rounds of the q school are best of 5 , the 3rd round best of 13 , then the 4th 5th and qualifying quarter final best of 7 , where’s the head or tail to that , if i felt i had a chance i’d prob keep my grand in the bank , i like short matches but best of 5 of is a bit too short .

                        Comment


                        • the official format is
                          Round 1 & 2 matches will be the best of 5 frames
                          Rounds 3 matches onwards will be best of 7 frames

                          no mention of 13
                          Up the TSF! :snooker:

                          Comment


                          • Originally Posted by DeanH View Post
                            the official format is
                            Round 1 & 2 matches will be the best of 5 frames
                            Rounds 3 matches onwards will be best of 7 frames

                            no mention of 13
                            the q school entry pack says number of frames 7 , so somethings up somewhere

                            Comment


                            • 5 frames for the first 2 rounds is too short for a grand entry fee , too much stick and too little carrott

                              Comment


                              • Wilson v Ursenbacher* is a very good match.
                                Practice, Learn, Improve, Enjoy, Practice, Learn, Improve, Enjoy :snooker:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X