If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I remember an interview with Dott where he mentions about going to a players dinner or awards night or whatever and different players were given expensive gifts. John Higgins got a bar of gold or something and Dott got a highlight DVD of him winning the tournament previously. I thought it summed up his treatment quite well.
Even the tone in the commentators' voice is different. When Dott drops a difficult pot it's "Yes. That was a great pot there from Graeme." When Robertson and the like play the same shot it's "Oooh, what a fantastic pot! This is why he's so feared as a player..."
When Robertson scores like this I usually wonder why he's 'only' won 1 WC and 1 Masters compared to Selby who has 3 of each. Perhaps I'm just underestimating just how great Selby has been though?
When Robertson scores like this I usually wonder why he's 'only' won 1 WC and 1 Masters compared to Selby who has 3 of each. Perhaps I'm just underestimating just how great Selby has been though?
Robertson tends to be an overthinker when he's not playing at his best. That did cost him a lot up to now.
Great frame of snooker, but unless the graphics were wrong, Leo Scullion called a miss against Robertson when he was 25 points ahead on the green. Dott had the balls replaced as well, so that was a bit harsh there...
Great frame of snooker, but unless the graphics were wrong, Leo Scullion called a miss against Robertson when he was 25 points ahead on the green. Dott had the balls replaced as well, so that was a bit harsh there...
Yup. I'm always unsure about the rule in that situtation, though...
Great frame of snooker, but unless the graphics were wrong, Leo Scullion called a miss against Robertson when he was 25 points ahead on the green. Dott had the balls replaced as well, so that was a bit harsh there...
Oh, so that's what they were talking about. The ref looked at Graeme after he'd called for them to be replaced and said something I couldn't hear, Graeme nodded his head, and then the ref turned to Neil and said something about snookers. Neil never questioned the replacement, though?
"Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"
Yup. I'm always unsure about the rule in that situtation, though...
Yeah, I was too, because it keeps changing. :smile: It seems the latest revision has again removed the paragraph that said the miss isn't called if the scores are equal before or after the shot. So everything was called correctly tonight. My bad, I should make a better effort of keeping up with the rule changes. :smile:
Comment