Originally Posted by Manu147
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Big pockets
Collapse
X
-
"Do unto others 20% better than you would expect them to do unto you, to correct for subjective error"
- Linus Pauling
-
Originally Posted by cazmac1 View PostThere is an under lining tone to his reply s that makes him sound like a big headed pr** what the hell has my cue to do with the thread his remarks were intended to be little me he can shove it where the sun don't shine."Do unto others 20% better than you would expect them to do unto you, to correct for subjective error"
- Linus Pauling
Comment
-
maybe my reply's have been a bit OTT so for that I apologize but I do think the guy should give some more thought to what he is saying before posting. He could have made his point with referring to me or my cue.
As far as I'm concerned the matter is closed.
Comment
-
-
I think the tables look to be very tight. You can see when the ball sits in the jaw and there is not much room either side.
I have played in some really old tables over the years and one that I play on just now is very tight up the cushion.
I think the main problem with many of the older club tables is how the cushions are cut into the corners. The one I play on just now is almost impossible to pot up the rail with any pace as the cut is not as rounded as the Star tables. This tends to push the ball away when it hits it rather than gather the ball. Straight on they are fine and measure around the same width opening as the template that was going around the forum a while ago but it is not as rounded.
I think this is what gives the impression that these are a bit generous when they are actually quite narrow.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by gem View PostI think the tables look to be very tight. You can see when the ball sits in the jaw and there is not much room either side.
I have played in some really old tables over the years and one that I play on just now is very tight up the cushion.
I think the main problem with many of the older club tables is how the cushions are cut into the corners. The one I play on just now is almost impossible to pot up the rail with any pace as the cut is not as rounded as the Star tables. This tends to push the ball away when it hits it rather than gather the ball. Straight on they are fine and measure around the same width opening as the template that was going around the forum a while ago but it is not as rounded.
I think this is what gives the impression that these are a bit generous when they are actually quite narrow.
In all the years I've been playing snooker I've never understood the idea of the under cut of the pocket because it just don't work. If you want to make the pocket bigger on a club table why can't the opening on the rail be designed bigger to allow a normal shaped pocket?
Comment
-
hi the main problem is the pocket design and shape /slate fall /pocket plate type will be very differant to the untrained eye when comparing a modern match table to a 40/100 year old club table when i fitted tables for thurstons/rileys i used to describe it as comparing a mki escort to a modeo most club tables have a pocket opening of 3 5/8 th across the fall sometimes even bigger
pro tables have an opening of 3 3/8th the big differance is pro pockets stay same opening from fall to pocket plate
old tables tend to go narrower from front to back , hope this helps people understand a bit
Comment
-
Originally Posted by gb147 View Posthi the main problem is the pocket design and shape /slate fall /pocket plate type will be very differant to the untrained eye when comparing a modern match table to a 40/100 year old club table when i fitted tables for thurstons/rileys i used to describe it as comparing a mki escort to a modeo most club tables have a pocket opening of 3 5/8 th across the fall sometimes even bigger
pro tables have an opening of 3 3/8th the big differance is pro pockets stay same opening from fall to pocket plate
old tables tend to go narrower from front to back , hope this helps people understand a bit
Comment
Comment