Originally Posted by Billy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2014 World Championship - Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by cueman View PostWell you'll never hear complaints about a player playing too fast but you'll hear plenty when it comes to deliberate slow play so make your own mind up about which is less acceptable!
This is a spectator sport now and at the end of the day they have a duty to entertain the paying audience and TV and sponsors because without them they'd have nothing. If every player employed gamesmanship, slow play and toilet breaks we wouldn't have a game.
I want to see chess with balls and this match is all the more intriguing for the contrast in styles and seeing who handles it best.
Comment
-
Good comeback from both Dom and Neil. Getting exciting!
My favourite players: Walter Lindrum (AUS), Neil Robertson (AUS), Eddie Charlton (AUS), Robby Foldvari (AUS), Vinnie Calabrese (AUS), Jimmy White, Stephen Hendry, Alex Higgins, Ronnie O'Sullivan, Dominic Dale and Barry Hawkins.
I dream of a 147 (but would be happy with a 100)
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Where's Willie? View PostIt is a spectator sport and I'm a spectator and not all of us want to see just lightning fast play and sessions over after an hour. I like to see a match and the contrast in styles and the dreaded word 'tactics' is part of that. I like to see how quick players deal with slow players and vice versa. If I wanted to see only players sprinting around the table and slamming in balls I'd go to an exhibition or watch re-runs of Big Break!
I want to see chess with balls and this match is all the more intriguing for the contrast in styles and seeing who handles it best.
What cueman says about the players having a duty to entertain the crowd is just wrong. More accurately, what he means by that is that players should be forced to play fast and 'naughty' snooker, which isn't always possible. Not only that, it's not even the style of many of the players, and the game is all the better for that fact."Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Where's Willie? View PostIt is a spectator sport and I'm a spectator and not all of us want to see just lightning fast play and sessions over after an hour. I like to see a match and the contrast in styles and the dreaded word 'tactics' is part of that. I like to see how quick players deal with slow players and vice versa. If I wanted to see only players sprinting around the table and slamming in balls I'd go to an exhibition or watch re-runs of Big Break!
I want to see chess with balls and this match is all the more intriguing for the contrast in styles and seeing who handles it best.
What cueman says about the players having a duty to entertain the crowd is just wrong. More accurately, what he means by that is that players should be forced to play fast and 'naughty' snooker, which isn't always possible. Not only that, it's not even the style of many of the players, and the game is all the better for that fact."Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"
Comment
-
I think the problem with Robbo and his speed of play is this. Folks don't mind watching a naturally slow player. I actually do enjoy the slow Ebdon frames almost as much as the quick Ronnie ones. But when you have a naturally quick player like Robbo deliberately slowing down his game it does make you wonder why. I can understand that he's behind and that he's trying to be accurate and careful. On the other hand. I do feel that there is a touch of gamesmanship going on here.
Comment
-
If you're going to allow players to deliberately play very slowly in an attempt to break the rhythm of their opponent, and you argue that it's all part of the game, then you also need to accept the trash talking prior to the game from people like Judd and Ronnie as just part of the mind games to throw their opponents off.
Both could be argued as being unsportsmanlike, but it's hypocritical to accept one and not the other.
Comment
Comment