Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Q School 1 and 2 May 14-19 and 20-25, 2015

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Good player, Daniel Wells. Not seen the others.

    I love Q School but think the pool's running dry a bit. These four lads have all been there or thereabouts in recent years, as have the guys they beat, and the only repeat entry to suddenly start doing well is Shachar Ruberg, unless someone really turns it on in Q2. I think the gap between the top amateurs and the bottom pros is basically nonexistent, and then after that there's a big jump down. If the same 10 or 12 players keep dominating, they should all get a card and the event be stopped, imo.

    Comment


    • #32
      I think it´s quite unfair that new draws isn´t made for Q2. As an example Marcus Campbell and a few others first enters in round 3 while Chen Zhe who made it to the last 8 got beaten by Andy Hicks in first round.
      ....its not called potting its called snooker. Quote: WildJONESEYE
      "Its called snooker not potting" Quote: Rory McLeod

      Comment


      • #33
        Eliot Slessor stuck on the motorway behind a big crash so won't get to the venue in time and it's looking like he might be starting 0-3
        It's hard to pot balls with a Chimpanzee tea party going on in your head

        Wibble

        Comment


        • #34
          That is some bad luck .
          Still trying to pot as many balls as i can !

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally Posted by neil taperell View Post
            That is some bad luck .
            Poor thing - that would be terrible
            My favourite players: Walter Lindrum (AUS), Neil Robertson (AUS), Eddie Charlton (AUS), Robby Foldvari (AUS), Vinnie Calabrese (AUS), Jimmy White, Stephen Hendry, Alex Higgins, Ronnie O'Sullivan, Dominic Dale and Barry Hawkins.
            I dream of a 147 (but would be happy with a 100)

            Comment


            • #36
              Yeah terrible he started 0-3 and he's out now
              It's hard to pot balls with a Chimpanzee tea party going on in your head

              Wibble

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally Posted by Master Blaster View Post
                Originally Posted by robertmac View Post
                Unfortunately she lost however she is playing in
                Qualifier #2 so she still has a chance left.
                I don't want this to sound all quotas and stuff, but as a long time Ladies WC, surely she should get a tour card for winning that title no? Folk get cards for minor events in Europe and Asia so I see no reason why she shouldn't get a card. If nothing else, to promote the game amongst women.

                Wait for it................................................ ................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! lol
                Never done anything on the main tour though, very good amateur player but not good enough to compete at the top level with the men

                Comment


                • #38
                  There are many players on the tour who havent done much
                  and I believe she deserves a chance to gain more experience
                  against better players.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    But she's not good enough so why should she take the place of people who are better ? all she has to do is beat them first

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally Posted by robertmac View Post
                      There are many players on the tour who havent done much
                      and I believe she deserves a chance to gain more experience
                      against better players.
                      Those players have earned their place on the tour, Reanne hasn't! She has had chances given to her imo that she didn't deserve and hasn't taken them, if she can't qualify through q-school then she doesn't belong on the tour anyway.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally Posted by jrc750 View Post
                        But she's not good enough so why should she take the place of people who are better ? all she has to do is beat them first
                        My sentiment exactly

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally Posted by jrc750 View Post
                          But she's not good enough so why should she take the place of people who are better ? all she has to do is beat them first
                          Imo it would be good for the game if a lady player was on the tour, yes there might be people who are better but they can't improve snooker in terms of appealing to a larger audience whereas a lady player most likely will
                          It's hard to pot balls with a Chimpanzee tea party going on in your head

                          Wibble

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally Posted by GeordieDS View Post
                            Originally Posted by jrc750 View Post
                            But she's not good enough so why should she take the place of people who are better ? all she has to do is beat them first
                            Imo it would be good for the game if a lady player was on the tour, yes there might be people who are better but they can't improve snooker in terms of appealing to a larger audience whereas a lady player most likely will
                            If a lady can qualify it would be great, giving a wild card would undermine them imo as people would still say they didn't earn it

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally Posted by Dave Walton View Post
                              If a lady can qualify it would be great, giving a wild card would undermine them imo as people would still say they didn't earn it
                              I disagree because i think being ladies World Champion should earn you the card
                              It's hard to pot balls with a Chimpanzee tea party going on in your head

                              Wibble

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally Posted by GeordieDS View Post
                                Originally Posted by Dave Walton View Post
                                If a lady can qualify it would be great, giving a wild card would undermine them imo as people would still say they didn't earn it
                                I disagree because i think being ladies World Champion should earn you the card
                                So then it becomes sexist as only a woman can get on the tour that way, which is wrong! The ladies world title has nothing to do with the main tour so should not entitle the champion to get a place on the main tour, or even an invite into the main world championships which was the case this year. If women want to be taken seriously in the game then scrap the ladies tour and enter pro/am and open tournaments and try to earn a place on the tour same as the men have to

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X