Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2016 UK Championship

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Come on Selby

    Comment


    • *Ronnie voice* "he's made of metal innit"
      Highest Match Break 39 (November 10th 2015)

      Comment


      • Tension in the air, bet Selby's thinking what if he potted that simple ball for 4-0

        Comment


        • Looks like 4 all...

          Once again...Game on!

          :snooker:

          Comment


          • What's happened in the Brecel game apart from the result, was Murphy on form?

            Comment


            • Originally Posted by VillaGuy View Post
              What's happened in the Brecel game apart from the result, was Murphy on form?
              Would like to know as well. Hopefully there'll be a bit of time left in this program so the Beeb can let us know.

              Glad to see Murphy through. One of my favourite players and Brecel doesn't do anything for me...I find him far too casual a player too often.

              Comment


              • Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's my understand that the ref shouldn't remind a player of the game's current status unless asked, but that incident just then when Higgins put Selby back in after Selby had gone in-off, it appears that's exactly what the ref did. When Selby came to the table he looked as though he may have forgotten is was ball-in-hand and was about to play it from the cushion where the ref had placed it.

                By picking up the cueball as Selby was weighing up the reds (it almost looked like the ref pretended he'd seen a mark on the cueball, as an excuse to pick it up) and cleaning it, he reminded Selby it was ball-in-hand.

                I'm not suggesting Selby had forgotten it was ball-in-hand and I'm sure Higgins would have told him if he went to play it from the cushion, but still interesting what the ref did there.
                Last edited by Billy; 2 December 2016, 04:42 PM.
                "Kryten, isn't it round about this time of year that your head goes back to the lab for retuning?"

                Comment


                • Originally Posted by Billy View Post
                  Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's my understand that the ref shouldn't remind a player of the game's current status unless asked, but that incident just then when Higgins put Selby back in after Selby had gone in-off, it appears that's exactly what the ref did. When Selby came to the table he looked as though he may have forgotten is was ball-in-hand and was about to play it from the cushion where the ref had placed it.

                  By picking up the cueball as Selby was weighing up the reds (it almost looked like the ref pretended he'd seen a mark on the cueball, as an excuse to pick it up) and cleaning it, he reminded Selby it was ball-in-hand.

                  I'm not suggesting Selby had forgotten it was ball-in-hand and I'm sure Higgins would have told him if he went to play it from the cushion, but still interesting what the ref did there.
                  Wasn't the question on whether Higgins knew it was an in off or not, Selby had just played an in off shot and with the ball in hand he put Selby back in, Selby clearly knew but Higgins might have missed it. I think that's what the commentators wondered.

                  Comment


                  • Looks like Higgins going one up again on Selby. Barring snookers that is.

                    Comment


                    • Originally Posted by Billy View Post
                      Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's my understand that the ref shouldn't remind a player of the game's current status unless asked, but that incident just then when Higgins put Selby back in after Selby had gone in-off, it appears that's exactly what the ref did. When Selby came to the table he looked as though he may have forgotten is was ball-in-hand and was about to play it from the cushion where the ref had placed it.

                      By picking up the cueball as Selby was weighing up the reds (it almost looked like the ref pretended he'd seen a mark on the cueball, as an excuse to pick it up) and cleaning it, he reminded Selby it was ball-in-hand.

                      I'm not suggesting Selby had forgotten it was ball-in-hand and I'm sure Higgins would have told him if he went to play it from the cushion, but still interesting what the ref did there.
                      hm, Mark was the offending player and was put back in but Higgins.
                      Not that Mark addressed the cue ball at all, but went straight round to look at the reds (ref then picked up the cue ball during this time)
                      Interesting one, "am I ball in hand?" can the referee answer that question? LondonLad?
                      Up the TSF! :snooker:

                      Comment


                      • what a match, everyone knew you couldn't guess the winner

                        Comment


                        • you can guess the winner
                          Highest Match Break 39 (November 10th 2015)

                          Comment


                          • ...And a decider it is! Amazing every time how surprising a snooker match can pan out with these twists and turns.

                            So who do I want to come through? That's like choosing your favorite peanut...impossible!

                            :snooker:

                            Comment


                            • Originally Posted by armstm View Post
                              you can guess the winner
                              You mean can('t)

                              Comment


                              • You can guess! you might not be right though.
                                Highest Match Break 39 (November 10th 2015)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X