Just reading that back I meant QF/SF as a 1 table, not the whole tournament!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you like this Neal Foulds, Neil Robertson and other players proposal for the WC?
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by Steven G View PostAs it stands now, most frames are done in less than 20 minutes so I reckon a slight increase in round 1 matches wouldn't be such a bad idea. Maybe rounds 1 and 2 - 2 sessions best of 21 and QF/SFs 3 sessions best of 31 (both being played as a 1 table set up) and keeping the final as it is would be better. The paying public are increasingly getting less viewing time for their money. I'd even be up for a 3 week long tournament.
Example, with current standands
QF1: Day 1 10:00//Day 2 14:30//Day 3 19:00
QF2: Day 1:14:30//Day 2 19:00//Day 4 10:00
QF3: Day 1:19:00// Day 3 10:00//Day 4 14:30
QF4: Day 2:10:00//Day 3 14:30//Day 4 19:00
2 of the matches lasts 4 days to end, I think it is not a possible schedule
Comment
-
Originally Posted by snookerball View PostAbsolutely not, but I'd have the entire event as Best of 35s including the qualifiers so I may not be the best to ask......
Personally I would be against any shortening of the two week match schedule, and I would argue that the UK needs to be restored to it's previous format. I'd like to see longer matches at the masters, too. The triple crown events should be special, and ridiculous tests sort of special.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by presprout View PostIn my mind this is right-thinking. The world championship absolutely must remain a ridiculous test of stamina, with players having the opportunity to play themselves in and out of form, and still win (or lose). I don't really watch most of the coin toss short format tournaments, they just don't hold my attention. I was always fascinated by the long grind over multiple sessions, and the sort of player (like mathew stevens) who appeared to be long format specialists.
Personally I would be against any shortening of the two week match schedule, and I would argue that the UK needs to be restored to it's previous format. I'd like to see longer matches at the masters, too. The triple crown events should be special, and ridiculous tests sort of special.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by presprout View PostIn my mind this is right-thinking. The world championship absolutely must remain a ridiculous test of stamina, with players having the opportunity to play themselves in and out of form, and still win (or lose). I don't really watch most of the coin toss short format tournaments, they just don't hold my attention. I was always fascinated by the long grind over multiple sessions, and the sort of player (like mathew stevens) who appeared to be long format specialists.
Personally I would be against any shortening of the two week match schedule, and I would argue that the UK needs to be restored to it's previous format. I'd like to see longer matches at the masters, too. The triple crown events should be special, and ridiculous tests sort of special.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by cesard View PostI agree with you. But just one comment, the reason to reduce the semi-final was not like to change the current world championhsip in a short format, it just because of the proportion between rounds. Semi now is basically as long as the final, and lasts one day more
Comment
Comment