This is for all you jimmy white knockers out there you say he should not be given the wild card .well i 'like thousands more would rather watch jimmy play than some unknown at least he will fill the place' and as for mark an average player at his best king if he was playing snooker in my garden i would shut the curtains hope you will all come back on after jimmy dumps him .
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I would shut the curtains .
Collapse
X
-
Didn't you post something similar in the Jimmy thread? Or am I going mad...
Anyway don't we have enough threads opened about Jimmy already? and if you really eould shut the curtains on Mark King then your not much of a snooker fan imo
EDIT: it was in the big bill thread not jimmy
http://www.thesnookerforum.com/board...ing#post448342Last edited by RGCirencester; 1 January 2010, 02:48 AM.sigpic A Truly Beakerific Long Pot Sir!
Comment
-
Originally Posted by RGCirencester View PostDidn't you post something similar in the Jimmy thread? Or am I going mad...
Anyway don't we have enough threads opened about Jimmy already? and if you really eould shut the curtains on Mark King then your not much of a snooker fan imo
EDIT: it was in the big bill thread not jimmy
http://www.thesnookerforum.com/board...ing#post448342
Comment
-
Right mate you just shot your self in the foot... Go find ONE POST where I have slagged Jimmy off... I have nothing against him getting the wildcard it fills the venue then fair enough. Yes hes not likely to win it but if you just awarded wildcards by recent results you might as well just hold 2 qualifiers.
If Mark King is such an "average" player, I would like to see you beat him in a match... I think anyone that is within the top 100 of their sport in the world (let alone the top 16) can be described as more than just "an average player"
And you posting the same sentiments in multiple threads is not going to make your point come across any better.sigpic A Truly Beakerific Long Pot Sir!
Comment
-
Originally Posted by matoski View PostOn your profile it says you are 43, but you act like a teenager. Grow up!
Comment
-
Mark King got way more knocking since the whole wild-card incident and all he did to earn it was being in the top 16. I'm no King fan, and I can understand if others don't enjoy watching him but he's there fair and square and judging by the current rankings he's a better player at the moment than Jimmy. I also said in the other thread that I hope Jimmy will win at least one match but I guess that would mean a bunch of "We told you so!" threads to appear, so frankly I don't care anymore. The decision was made, some agree with it, some don't, maybe everybody should just get over it now.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by mick 142 View PostThis is for all you jimmy white knockers out there you say he should not be given the wild card .well i 'like thousands more would rather watch jimmy play than some unknown at least he will fill the place' and as for mark an average player at his best king if he was playing snooker in my garden i would shut the curtains hope you will all come back on after jimmy dumps him .
Should be a good match and I don't think there is much in it with Jimmy White and him. :snooker:
Comment
-
Guys
Guys Guys Guys... This a forum where people can voice their opinions on anything to do with snooker, everyone has an opinion on Jimmy, there is no right or wrong in my mind. Lets not turn it into a youtube style slagging match.
As much as I am a big fan of Jimmy, Mark King is a pretty solid match player, you don't get to where he has without being that. I know he's not the worlds most exciting player but for him it's a living.
Should be a good match.Forget it, Donny, you're out of your element
Comment
-
Ive never EVER been a fan of Mark King... his presence in the top 16 continues to suprise me.
however, Jimmy will lose to him.
the wildcard for the masters is exactly that, its to give the fans something to see on the early round of a tournament. Wilds never stand a chance in the china open or shanghai so why should this be any different?
i wouldnt really complain if they gave the spot to jan verhaas or Clive Everton. Jimmy brings something to the tournament so its fair, but anyone who still belives he's there for any reason other than his profile in the game is deluded and living in the past.Fantasy Game Overall Winner 09/10 - World Championship 2009 Fantasy Game Winner - Seasonlong Prediction Contest Overall Winner 09/10 - Seasonlong Prediction Contest Runner-Up 08/09 - UK Championship 2010 Prediction Contest Winner - Rileys @ Chorlton Pool Team Merit Winner 07/08, 09/10:snooker:
Comment
-
Originally Posted by steedee View PostWilds never stand a chance in the china open or shanghai so why should this be any different?
Whatever. I didn't agree to the award of this wildcard to Jimmy and I still don't. Unless the authorities make it clear on what ground they award them, and that's definitely NOT on merit in this case.
Now for Jimmy's sake I just hope he doesn't disgrace himself completely at the table.Proud winner of the 2008 Bahrain Championship Lucky Dip
http://ronnieosullivan.tv/forum/index.php
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Monique View Postmmmm ... remember a certain Ding in 2005?
Whatever. I didn't agree to the award of this wildcard to Jimmy and I still don't. Unless the authorities make it clear on what ground they award them, and that's definitely NOT on merit in this case.
Now for Jimmy's sake I just hope he doesn't disgrace himself completely at the table.
The argument is very strong for other players like Walden etc.,
But for this poster there is only one Whirlwind of London town and I hope he enjoys himself and does well. :snooker:
Comment
Comment