Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shanghai Masters Discussions Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally Posted by PaulTheSoave
    blah blah blah
    YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO AN OPINION

















    only joking mate

    good posts and source for debates

    would be boring if we all agreed.

    the whole thing revolves on what you / i / anyone else thinks a bottler is

    i think getting far, and failing shows loads of bottle. at least more than never getting very far.

    each to their own

    is it time to get off this rollercoaster?

    Comment


    • Originally Posted by Alex0paul
      But the thing is Ryan Day hasn't been in the position to win titles whereas Matthew has. Nobody should lose a match when you are 12-7 up and its first to 13. He bottled it in the final against Murphy when took on the most stupid shot I have ever seen when leading 11-10 he took a frame ball blue on with his left hand and missed. The only time Ryan Day bottled it of any note was when he should have knocked Higgins out of the 1st round at the 2004 WC when he missed match ball pink at 9-7 up.
      having the bottle to get consistently further than Day, its inevitable that he will have more chances to mess up and play terrible, and hence bottle it every now and again.

      hes showed more bottle to get there IMHO

      Comment


      • I like the debate and difference of opinion. What i cant stand is people who come and tell me I am not right or I should not say this and that. Who do they think they are, the owners of this board? not so, me thinks!

        Comment


        • Well, if the 2 times champion (proved not to be a bottler). says it, I must be right!

          Originally Posted by Alex0paul
          As you can see from my previous post, I agree with you.

          Comment


          • Originally Posted by PaulTheSoave
            The difference between Day and Stevens, Day never got to a world final! And Stevens did! Also Matthew had quite some opportunities to win a world title where he was at the finishing line and did not cross over. The same last season when he lead 12-7 against Murphy and did not take fhe final frame. Difference between Day and Stevens, the first one is an up and coming player while Stevens is an established player.

            And dont come and tell me it is not a right thing to say! it is my opinion, or is this again the daily slag off another member moment? I AM ENTITLED TO MY OPINION!

            (where I dont mean Semihs' post, thats founded on criteria and arguments)
            I did not say you cannot express your opinion. I just stated my opinion (ok, should have added IMHO), I don't think that only playing in world final and losing there means the guy is a bottler. If he is a bottler, he'll be a bottler in any tournament - and I don't think Matthew has always been a bottler in those.
            ZIPPIE FOR CHAIRMAN

            Comment


            • Originally Posted by PaulTheSoave
              I like the debate and difference of opinion. What i cant stand is people who come and tell me I am not right or I should not say this and that. Who do they think they are, the owners of this board? not so, me thinks!
              you are NOT RIGHT




















              but you are not wrong either

              its all opinion, as no matter how you define bottler, its how you think a person has lost. (did he just miss, due to a bad technique, or did pressure make him miss)

              as, players miss easy pots while not under pressure at all, so its hard to say whether the pressure made a difference

              as said, all opinion, and i like yours PTS, even though i dont agree.

              fancy a doughnut?

              Comment


              • cherry or chocolate?

                Originally Posted by Semih_Sayginer

                fancy a doughnut?

                Comment


                • Originally Posted by PaulTheSoave
                  cherry or chocolate?
                  Yes


















                  ok, cherry. the chocolates are bottlers

                  Comment


                  • to all:

                    who do you think will win todays later games?

                    (bear in mind, ability and bottle SHOULD come into your decision making)

                    Comment


                    • I wish I could think Semih. Selby and Dott
                      ZIPPIE FOR CHAIRMAN

                      Comment


                      • I'd say Selby and Dott simply because I can't stand Bingham and I support Dott.
                        TSF World Champion 2010
                        TSF Snooker Prediction Contest Overall Champion 2006/07
                        BBC Snooker Prediction Contest Overall Champion 2005/06

                        Comment


                        • hehehehehe
                          Good one!

                          The obvious ones would be Selby and Dott, but Lee is in with a shout. Since I have seen him playing at Wembley hes allowed to lose though! Bingham is the dark horse here.

                          Originally Posted by Nina

                          errr.... maybe if someone defined bottle...

                          Comment


                          • I'm going for Lee and Selby!!!

                            Comment


                            • im going for Ronnie


                              erm, i mean lunch


                              (PTS, changed my avatar for you )

                              Comment


                              • I cant see Stevens' picture!!

                                Originally Posted by Semih_Sayginer


                                (PTS, changed my avatar for you )

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X