
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ronnie O Sullivan v Neil Robertson - Quarter Final
Collapse
X
-
Ronnie hasn't had a good chance to win the worlds like this in years so it's all in his hands now. If he beats Robertson it's 100% sure that he will have his 4th world title which means that i'm going to get drunk that night and possibly fire a couple rockets from my balcony that i have left from new years eve party
-
Originally Posted by davisskeggsm View PostGot money on Neil to win the whole compotition
Matt
Leave a comment:
-
I believe Stephen Maguire dominates in head to head with Robertson so even if Robertson wins this match and semi he may have to face Maguire in final.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by breakman16 View PostI'll have to look up what that means, he's talking rubbish and for insulting one of the greatest of all time, that was virtually slander, I can't make a 20 break but I realise the immense skill it takes to play snooker at pro level, if he really believes that then that person doesnt belong here
Leave a comment:
-
Ronnie O Sullivan v Neil Robertson - Quarter Final
Got money on Neil to win the whole compotition
Matt
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by doorag View PostYou've just been trolled :/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Masterdoctorgenius View Postany1 predictions for tomorrow
will the one frame make the difference like in the other two matches and start the self destruction mode of ronnie.
or will he show his champions skills and overcome todays emotion
But I'm still sticking with my initial prediction... Robertson is just an awkward player to beat at the moment, and when the pressure really comes on, I fancy him to be a frame or two stronger.
Looking forward to finding out...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by breakman16 View Postyou call an UNDER ACHIEVER but still one of the greatest players of all time a bottler? He's won nearly 30 ranking titles, the vast majority of people dont win 10 in a career, a lot done even win more than 1! You have NOTHING to back that statement up, most players would give their limbs to have Ronnie's talent!
Leave a comment:
-
would like to see ronnie go through but something tells me robertson is going to edge it!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Table_of_Reds View PostO'Sullivan is useless against anyone in the top 7 or so in the world (Williams the exception that proves the rule). As a top level snooker player he's finished, and he has been for several years now, he's a glorified version of the Hendry of the past few years. He can beat the little guys around, the chokers, the has-beens and never-will-bes... but when someone who really is top class (real top class that is, not overhyped to infinity like him) and not a choker e.g. Higgins, Selby, Robertson, Trump, Allen he gets found out to be the mediocre, bottleless player he is.
Maybe he can put in a half decent show, pull of a century or two to make the morons in the commentary box spunk a few times and give the cretins in the audience a reason to shout "come on Ronnie!", but as long as Robertson plays at least half decent like he did today he'll cruise through.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Cue_Seeker View Postyou said if it's all economics, there won't be billiard or snooker pros.
it is EXACTLY economics at work that these pros give up other things to fight for a chance of glory/utility and money! Honestly, you are just repeating everything.... sorry mate this is as simple as I can bring it to you, I never knew such simple economics can be that hard to understand.
Anyway, I will end it here and back to the topic guys!
Leave a comment:
-
hendry retired sad day
best player of all time
but came at the wrong time
for ronnie it must be a shock, now focous is double difficult
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by breakman16 View PostIn snooker there are money opportunities but only at th top of the game, everyone else has to scrape a living while likely having a job, those outside the top 50 I doubt make a living from the game, if it was all about economics then there would never be billiards or squash pros, for example. If you think about it there aren't many sports that you can make any sort of quality income from, the passion must be there to do the best you can, and if you make money along the way then so be it, all snooker pros should aspire to be the absolute best they can and in the top 32 cases they make some sort of income from the game, plus Steve Jobs revolutionised an industry almost, and if anyone made that much money that they didnt need it all then its great for their public relations to give it away, win win for them!
it is EXACTLY economics at work that these pros give up other things to fight for a chance of glory/utility and money! Honestly, you are just repeating everything.... sorry mate this is as simple as I can bring it to you, I never knew such simple economics can be that hard to understand.
Anyway, I will end it here and back to the topic guys!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Table_of_Reds View PostO'Sullivan is useless against anyone in the top 7 or so in the world (Williams the exception that proves the rule). As a top level snooker player he's finished, and he has been for several years now, he's a glorified version of the Hendry of the past few years. He can beat the little guys around, the chokers, the has-beens and never-will-bes... but when someone who really is top class (real top class that is, not overhyped to infinity like him) and not a choker e.g. Higgins, Selby, Robertson, Trump, Allen he gets found out to be the mediocre, bottleless player he is.
Maybe he can put in a half decent show, pull of a century or two to make the morons in the commentary box spunk a few times and give the cretins in the audience a reason to shout "come on Ronnie!", but as long as Robertson plays at least half decent like he did today he'll cruise through.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: