If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
No, of course the rules can't be changed after the game has started.
But Williams is proving to be a good pick with these two results. He's already scored the points one would normally get for reaching the SF, and there's every chance he goes very far in the tournament. I wouldn't have predicted this, considering he was up against a "nasty" qualifier.
not saying we should change the rules in the middle of the contest (though I wouldn't mind)
it just needs to be taken into account for future tournaments
eg if a player whitewashes his opponent at the Crucible he gets the same 5 points I mean how can we possibly compare the Crucible with its first to ten and these short sprints at the Welsh open?
Winner of the China Open Fantasy Game 2010 Winner of the 2010 Shanghai Masters Lucky Dip
If there is a whitewash at the crucible user who has that player in team gets 100 points and wins the contest automatically(if someone else doesnt get a whitewash)
2007 TSF Pot Black prediction contest winner
2010 TSF Welsh Open Predict the qualifiers winner
not saying we should change the rules in the middle of the contest (though I wouldn't mind)
it just needs to be taken into account for future tournaments
eg if a player whitewashes his opponent at the Crucible he gets the same 5 points I mean how can we possibly compare the Crucible with its first to ten and these short sprints at the Welsh open?
Yes, I agree with the sentiment. Also, there are some inconsistencies with the scoring system. For instance, some tournaments had extra points for the highest break or a maximum, while the last two didn't.
But ok, as long as the scoring system is known in advance and is the same for everyone, it doesn't bother me too much.
Yes, I agree with the sentiment. Also, there are some inconsistencies with the scoring system. For instance, some tournaments had extra points for the highest break or a maximum, while the last two didn't.
But ok, as long as the scoring system is known in advance and is the same for everyone, it doesn't bother me too much.
Scoring has been a massive problem for quite a long time, and I'm struggling to find a way to figure this out.
I'm relieved to see that at least there's no injustice between participants.
But still, any new ideas or just the share of your opinions on the subject will be appreciated
All the way Mark J!!
I understand nothing from snooker. - Dedicated to jrc750!
Comment