Euro Tour 3 - Antwerp

[SnookerFan]

why wont you try and stay relevant ?

Well said.

If he was 'devoid of talent', how come he keeps appearing in ranking tournament finals (winning two of them) and has won The Masters title twice? The people who seem to be under the impression it's easy to do what Selby does are welcome to prove it by getting on the main tour and winning more than he has.

[arbitrage]

Well said.

If he was 'devoid of talent', how come he keeps appearing in ranking tournament finals (winning two of them) and has won The Masters title twice? The people who seem to be under the impression it's easy to do what Selby does are welcome to prove it by getting on the main tour and winning more than he has.

firstly, you are responding to a known troll and ronnie-hater who registers under the same exact handle on ronnie fan sites to post thousands of trolling messages about him. well said indeed

secondly, all of mark selby's wins are contentious because if he hadn't resorted to dirty tactics such as deliberate slow play & other attritional tactics (2008, 2010 masters, 2008 welsh), slamming balls to create confusion and thereby upsetting his opponent (2011 shanghai masters), he wouldn't have won any of them. any of the finals he has been in where he has played half properly, he has lost. in any case, all he is doing is working the system to farm points like caroline wozniacki. you might consider her talented as well - most people don't

[SnookerFan]

firstly, you are responding to a known troll and ronnie-hater who registers under the same exact handle on ronnie fan sites to post thousands of trolling messages about him. well said indeed

secondly, all of mark selby's wins are contentious because if he hadn't resorted to dirty tactics such as deliberate slow play & other attritional tactics (2008, 2010 masters, 2008 welsh), slamming balls to create confusion and thereby upsetting his opponent (2011 shanghai masters), he wouldn't have won any of them. any of the finals he has been in where he has played half properly, he has lost. in any case, all he is doing is working the system to farm points like caroline wozniacki. you might consider her talented as well - most people don't

Slamming balls around to try and confuse and upset his opponent? You mean he was playing snooker?

[wildJONESEYE]

firstly, you are responding to a known troll and ronnie-hater who registers under the same exact handle on ronnie fan sites to post thousands of trolling messages about him. well said indeed

secondly, all of mark selby's wins are contentious because if he hadn't resorted to dirty tactics such as deliberate slow play & other attritional tactics (2008, 2010 masters, 2008 welsh), slamming balls to create confusion and thereby upsetting his opponent (2011 shanghai masters), he wouldn't have won any of them. any of the finals he has been in where he has played half properly, he has lost. in any case, all he is doing is working the system to farm points like caroline wozniacki. you might consider her talented as well - most people don't

firstly there's one troll on here and that's you

secondly there's only one troll on here and that's you

thirdly there's only one troll on here and that's you

i could go on but i doubt you with that little brain of yours would never get it so i wont waste my time.

[nrage]

firstly, you are responding to a known troll and ronnie-hater who registers under the same exact handle on ronnie fan sites to post thousands of trolling messages about him. well said indeed

Pot/Kettle/Black. You're the troll, a well known Selby hater (or I should say more accurately a Ronnie-lover who hates Selby, Ebdon, and anyone else Ronnie has a meltdown over). You seem incapable of reasoned/rational debate on any topic involving Ronnie or any of his arch-nemesis.

[wildJONESEYE]

firstly, you are responding to a known troll and ronnie-hater who registers under the same exact handle on ronnie fan sites to post thousands of trolling messages about him. well said indeed

secondly, all of mark selby's wins are contentious because if he hadn't resorted to dirty tactics such as deliberate slow play & other attritional tactics (2008, 2010 masters, 2008 welsh), slamming balls to create confusion and thereby upsetting his opponent (2011 shanghai masters), he wouldn't have won any of them. any of the finals he has been in where he has played half properly, he has lost. in any case, all he is doing is working the system to farm points like caroline wozniacki. you might consider her talented as well - most people don't

christ that must be seifer almasy ???

cant be 2 people this thick and clueless on earth if so id want god to resign.

[arbitrage]

Slamming balls around to try and confuse and upset his opponent? You mean he was playing snooker?

there is no need for me to elaborate on the pink/red incident which cost Mark Williams the 2011 shanghai masters title

http://snookerscene.blogspot.hk/2009...er-league.html

http://stupidityexpose.blogspot.hk/

[SnookerFan]

Thanks for bringing that last blog to my attention. It's always good for a laugh reading Seifer's anti-stupidity blog, especially as I've had several mentions on it in the past.

I didn't realise he'd written an additional blog in the past, and I notice I get a metnion. I read with amused wonder the opinions of a man who thinks if Ronnie isn't your favourite player, you are a bad person.

Big fan of that blog.

[SnookerFan]

http://stupidityexpose.blogspot.hk/

That guy is unreal, seriously.

Firstly, half the stuff he said were lies about him, weren't. He did come back onto that forum and start posting pornographic photos to people on the forum that he hates. He acts like only one person claimed it, and that person is lying.

Secondly, his idea that people have to be fans of the same player he is, or they're idiotic doesn't prove other people's stupidity, it proves his.

Thirdly, what sort of person keeps reading a forum he's barred from just to find Anti-Ronnie comments so he can write a blog about that forum? He really should get out more.

Fourthly, half of the quotes he puts up aren't Anti-Ronnie. Saying a person is playing like crap is a statement in itself. Half the comments he mentions are commenting on Ronnie's opponents not playing well. If they aren't playing well, people shouldn't say they are just in case fans of Ronnie are upset. Saying Mark Williams played poorly against Ronnie is a comment on Mark Williams, not Ronnie. Just because he's a Ronnie fan, does he assume every person Ronnie has ever played has played well against him? It's nonsense to pretend that. Also pulling up quotes where people have predicted a Ronnie loss doesn't mean they are disrespecting Ronnie. He was having a poor season at the time (by his high standards). Are people supposed to pretend otherwise for risk of offending people. A lot of people are fans of Judd too. Does that mean we have to pretend Judd played well in every single match in his career?

Fifthly, he seems to mention me a lot in a negative light, considering a month or so before his site closed down (only to be re-opened in a couple of a days time), he pm'd me and asked me to be a mod. If I'm such a douche, why does he want me moderating his site?

What an utter wally.

[nrage]

So.. "Daniel" is "Seifer Almasy" is "arbitrage". Good to know. Time to install a bu115h1t filter.

[arbitrage]

so you are the infamous snookerfan - no wonder you agree with the other welsh troll

and no, i'm not seifer or daniel - anyone with more than room temperature IQ would know that from reading my profile

[nrage]

so you are the infamous snookerfan - no wonder you agree with the other welsh troll

and no, i'm not seifer or daniel - anyone with more than room temperature IQ would know that from reading my profile

Are you replying to me? Hard to tell as you didn't quote.

No, I'm not SnookerFan .. and I did read your very sparse profile, which is proof of nothing - given that you can make it read whatever you like and there is no verification process involved. Either you are Daniel, Seifer, or you're of the same ilk, regardless this is me ignoring everything you say from this point forward. Have a nice life.

[SnookerFan]

I'm not sure about infamous. I'm the SnookerFan he rambles on about in his blog, if that's what you mean. I wouldn't take any notice of the stuff he says though. He's just a guy with an axe to grind because he's got banned from the site. I'm not sure if I'm allowed to mention the forums name, but it's the one he keeps mentioning in his blog.

Not even worth the attention we've already given him in this thread.

[SnookerFan]

Are you replying to me? Hard to tell as you didn't quote.

No, I'm not SnookerFan .. and I did read your very sparse profile, which is proof of nothing - given that you can make it read whatever you like and there is no verification process involved. Either you are Daniel, Seifer, or you're of the same ilk, regardless this is me ignoring everything you say from this point forward. Have a nice life.

I think I'm the 'infamous' SnookerFan. Ie. I'm the one Seifer mentions in his blog. I don't pay it much attention and chose to laugh about it when I do.

[wildJONESEYE]

so you are the infamous snookerfan - no wonder you agree with the other welsh troll

and no, i'm not seifer or daniel - anyone with more than room temperature IQ would know that from reading my profile

Troll,Ronnie Hater,IQ these are all phrases The Burke uses uses and uses again