If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It has been mentioned many times in the past about the starting times of the final, why 2pm and 8pm when all previous days of the tournament have been 1pm and 7 pm, and the follow-on effect of late/early finishes.
I am sure it is connected to the past and the BBC Sunday football schedule but it could be changed without afftecting much nowadays, ?
There's no reason it couldn't have started at half six or seven, wouldn't have clashed with anything.
Problem if it goes to an early morning finish it will be problems for people travelling and like the British GP at Silverstone, it's not their fault if it rains but if they don't do everything they can to avoid bad news stories for spectators, they could lose it.
Couple of bad shows at Ally Pally and that will be looked at, I'm sure China would like to offer more prize money in return for a couple of wild cards.
Judging by last night that could go on well past 1am. We're getting fresh snow in london, it's packing and icing up and public transport wil stop at midnight - good luck if you're driving in for the final session.
It has been mentioned many times in the past about the starting times of the final, why 2pm and 8pm when all previous days of the tournament have been 1pm and 7 pm, and the follow-on effect of late/early finishes.
I am sure it is connected to the past and the BBC Sunday football schedule but it could be changed without afftecting much nowadays, ?
Judging by last night that could go on well past 1am. We're getting fresh snow in london, it's packing and icing up and public transport wil stop at midnight - good luck if you're driving in for the final session.
Personally, I find all of this quite amusing. I'm sure anyone looking through this thread tomorrow will find some of the statements quite bizarre. We had stuff like:
Selby can't score centuries
Selby will never be remembered for playing anything special, he doesn't go for any challenging pots, he only plays safety
Selby is a terrible positional player (would be better if he worked on it rather than boring his opponents)
Selby plays thin safeties to avoid opening up the reds
Selby isn't good enough to pot, so he hides behind other balls
It's embarrassing for the sport that Selby is number one, being so average
The only way Selby can compete is with disgustingly negative anti snooker
Selby's game consists of ****ty breaks of 20, cheap snookers and lifeless crowds, among other things
People don't like snooker because of players like Selby
Selby is destroying snooker
Selby is a cancer, you cannot fight him forever
Pick your favourite. :wink: On top of that, we had the usual complaining about Selby's luck. And of course, whenever a frame goes scrappy or the balls go awkward, it's Selby's disgusting plan to bore Dott, while Dott is just an innocent victim of his. :smile:
Couldn't agree more with this. Personally I have absolutely no issue with people who find Selby's play boring. We all have our favourite players and styles. What I don't respect is the faceless keyboard warriors on here who continually attack Selby's character. Some of the things these people say are comically stupid and provably false (can't score a century, just a lucky player). However, saying that Selby is "smug", "unclassy", or describing him as a "cancer" is just plain personal and uncalled for. Snooker is only a game, and Mark hasn't done anything wrong.
Leave a comment: