Will they be showing highlights on the BBC tonight? I hoped they'd put the match on the red button again, but ah well.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Masters 2014
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by scottley View PostFar to good when he's on it, i can't see anyone stopping him in April/May either, equalling the great Steve Davis' record is a huge incentive. Well done to the greatest snooker player of all time.It's hard to pot balls with a Chimpanzee tea party going on in your head
Wibble
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Ronnie's tip View PostWill they be showing highlights on the BBC tonight? I hoped they'd put the match on the red button again, but ah well.It's hard to pot balls with a Chimpanzee tea party going on in your head
Wibble
Comment
-
Originally Posted by arbitrage View Posti did not say deliberately. i said he was trolling. learn how to read and comprehend simple sentences please. why is it difficult for you to comprehend simple concepts? end of discussion
Ronnie is the greatest player in the history of the sport, in my opinion, but the nature of snooker, probably most sports is that even the greatest and most talented can lose to extremely determined "lesser" men.Last edited by gavpowell; 20 January 2014, 12:35 AM.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by gavpowell View PostI don't believe for a moment O'Sullivan deliberately lost those matches, which is essentially what you're saying. Hunter did the same thing to him, and frankly I never thought Hunter was all that good, let alone on a par with Ronnie. But sometimes in sport, a player/participant just comes up against someone whose style causes them real problems: for O'Sullivan it's the hard matchplayers who have the mentality of refusing to let go - he's just a lot better at dealing with it now than he used to be.
Ali and Norton were never in the same class and yet Norton gave Ali nightmares on three occasions, arguably winning them all. Ray Robinson was boxing's equivalent of Ronnie - nobody's ever looked as good as him before or since, yet he struggled like hell with Gene Fullmer and took two fights to work out Jake LaMotta. It happens.
Why is it so difficult for you to show a bit of class and give Selby credit for playing well enough on the day to beat Ronnie? It doesn't lessen O'Sullivan's ability or achievements - if anything I think it shows an impressive adaptability to his game that he's learnt to deal with guys who frustrate him.
There is no question that a Selby is "in Ronnie's class", if he were not, he could not have recorded the victories he has had. Ronnie is of course top of the class, that's the point. I had my doubts before this final, just as I have any time he pays Selby or Higgins but it seems that today he was good and Selby wasn't. For me, Ronnie is the best of all time but until he at least wins seven WCs there will always be those who ignore the evidence of their eyes and scramble for the record books (which they conveniently open at a point after Joe Davis.
In the "modern era" Ronnie and J Higgins are the first (Williams apart) multiple champions operating in a field that could beat them since Reardon (again always overlooked) Reardon, JH and ROS were beating great players and more importantly players of similar level for their titles, Hendry and S Davis were not. They should have won 8 each.
Ronnie and JH are also operating as contemporaries in WC winning terms, as did Reardon and Spencer, which Davis and Hendry did not. The argument of course would be moot if Reardon and Spencer had commenced WC play at the age of 19 as both may well have reached double figures.
Comment
-
We can't all be elite readers.After 15 reds and 15 blacks i did this http://youtu.be/DupuczMS2o4
Comment
-
-
Originally Posted by arbitrage View Post...and i try for reasoned discussion with everyone, regardless of their intelligence or comprehension abilities (or lack of)Highest Match Break 39 (November 10th 2015)
Comment
Comment