Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1973 world championship

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1973 world championship

    If anybodyhas the programme or posts the complete scores (by sessions). I´m interested

    In this year Ray Reardon made two incredible comebacks!

    In the stats section just it´s posted the scores, not by sessions

    Thanks!

  • #2
    Ray did indeed. I think he was something like 14-19 behind Spencer in the semi's and won 23-22. He then lost the first session of the final to Charlton 0-7. I'm not certain if I have the Snooker Scene you need to get those scores, but I will check when I get a moment.

    Comment


    • #3
      I´m really interested in this. If you could post it or tell me where I may find information I´ll give you thanks

      It´s so difficult find information about PreCrucible and just I´ve found here, in The Statman´s post

      Comment


      • #4
        1973 World Championship - final

        Reardon v. Charlton, Reardon's scores first, 30+ breaks in brackets:

        Session 1
        31-74, 17-70(58), 21-93(49), 28-72, 60(34)-68(30), 4-65(38), 45-71(41)
        0-7

        Session 2
        102(84)-26, 65-38, 95(32)-29, 54-50, 29-68, 60-52, 4-81(77), 27-72
        5-10

        Session 3
        53-70(70), 55-48, 62-30, 20-64, 87(38,38)-16, 91(31)-47(33), 64(42)-31
        10-12

        Session 4
        92(68)-5, 84(66)-26, 33-59, 74(31,32)-41, 67-41, 86(70)-11, 67(36)-32, 69-19
        17-13

        Session 5
        22-68, 56-57, 81(41,34)-13, 19-65(43), 47-79(48), 74-28, 39-63
        19-18

        Session 6
        69-46, 71(50)-43(38), 39-66(51), 55(45)-45(30), 29-75(52), 42-60(37), 70-38, 66-25
        24-21

        Session 7
        15-54(54), 23-92(68), 72(67)-0, 62-70(38), 66(31)-38, 8-79(56), 61-8
        27-25

        Session 8
        (Snooker Scene: "The fourth evening session broke the mould into which the match had settled. The unlikely agent of change was the television cameras, or rather the television lights, under which it was obvious after only a few shots that Charlton could see and Reardon could not.")
        25-95(38-30), 1-73(37-56[36?]),
        "Reardon, who had been looking angry and disturbed, then protested and two of the largest floodlights ... were switched off."
        25-73, 68(35)-28, 67(33)-35(30), 63-39(30), 12-60, 61-49
        31-29

        Session 9
        98(91)-18, 48-49, 58-20, 85(55)-11, 7-83(62), 67(51)-28, 69(63)-28
        36-31

        Session 10
        58-35, 30-55, 61(30)-40(32)
        38-32

        Comment


        • #5
          Cheers TS! Thank you for posting this. The BBC, I believe, televised the weekends only of this Championships, at Manchester, so it kicked in for certain quarter-finals (Fred Davis v Alex Higgins was one such) and then the later stages of the final the following week. Very interesting stats, Sir! :snooker:

          Comment


          • #6
            I could be wrong though! Perhaps the Davis/Higgins quarter I'm thinking of was their '74 encounter at Belle Vue, Machester, which Fred Davis won?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
              I could be wrong though! Perhaps the Davis/Higgins quarter I'm thinking of was their '74 encounter at Belle Vue, Machester, which Fred Davis won?
              That's correct. Davis won the match 15-14.

              Looking through my copy of Snooker Scene of June 1974, this quarter-final was described as the (match of the tournament)
              "Statistics won't tell you much about me. I play for love, not records."

              ALEX HIGGINS

              Comment


              • #8
                Yeh it was an epic! It was the '74 q/final they shown on Grandstand. There are some highlights of it on one of Roger Lee's B&S Archive video's and it was played one of those white 'plastic' tables, lol. Belle Vue, Manchester was a huge venue, described as an 'air craft hanger' type place.

                Higgins led 14-12 didn't he? Referee Jim Thorpe called him for a controversial 'push shot' and he lost his way thereafter.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally Posted by The Statman View Post
                  Reardon v. Charlton, Reardon's scores first, 30+ breaks in brackets:

                  Session 1
                  31-74, 17-70(58), 21-93(49), 28-72, 60(34)-68(30), 4-65(38), 45-71(41)
                  0-7

                  Session 2
                  102(84)-26, 65-38, 95(32)-29, 54-50, 29-68, 60-52, 4-81(77), 27-72
                  5-10

                  Session 3
                  53-70(70), 55-48, 62-30, 20-64, 87(38,38)-16, 91(31)-47(33), 64(42)-31
                  10-12

                  Session 4
                  92(68)-5, 84(66)-26, 33-59, 74(31,32)-41, 67-41, 86(70)-11, 67(36)-32, 69-19
                  17-13

                  Session 5
                  22-68, 56-57, 81(41,34)-13, 19-65(43), 47-79(48), 74-28, 39-63
                  19-18

                  Session 6
                  69-46, 71(50)-43(38), 39-66(51), 55(45)-45(30), 29-75(52), 42-60(37), 70-38, 66-25
                  24-21

                  Session 7
                  15-54(54), 23-92(68), 72(67)-0, 62-70(38), 66(31)-38, 8-79(56), 61-8
                  27-25

                  Session 8
                  (Snooker Scene: "The fourth evening session broke the mould into which the match had settled. The unlikely agent of change was the television cameras, or rather the television lights, under which it was obvious after only a few shots that Charlton could see and Reardon could not.")
                  25-95(38-30), 1-73(37-56[36?]),
                  "Reardon, who had been looking angry and disturbed, then protested and two of the largest floodlights ... were switched off."
                  25-73, 68(35)-28, 67(33)-35(30), 63-39(30), 12-60, 61-49
                  31-29

                  Session 9
                  98(91)-18, 48-49, 58-20, 85(55)-11, 7-83(62), 67(51)-28, 69(63)-28
                  36-31

                  Session 10
                  58-35, 30-55, 61(30)-40(32)
                  38-32
                  Some very good footage of these frames in the B&S archive...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally Posted by Cyril View Post

                    Higgins led 14-12 didn't he? Referee Jim Thorpe called him for a controversial 'push shot' and he lost his way thereafter.
                    And not the last time that a controversial decision against Alex Higgins by Jim Thorpe occurred. During the final of the 1980 Wilson Classic, Higgins was called for a foul by Thorpe when playing an ambitious screw shot on the yellow, which upset Higgins for the rest of the frame.

                    I think its fair to say the two of them never saw eye to eye..
                    "Statistics won't tell you much about me. I play for love, not records."

                    ALEX HIGGINS

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
                      Yeh it was an epic! It was the '74 q/final they shown on Grandstand. There are some highlights of it on one of Roger Lee's B&S Archive video's and it was played one of those white 'plastic' tables, lol. Belle Vue, Manchester was a huge venue, described as an 'air craft hanger' type place.

                      Higgins led 14-12 didn't he? Referee Jim Thorpe called him for a controversial 'push shot' and he lost his way thereafter.
                      Here are the scores of the 1974 championship, in case you are interested.
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
                        It was the '74 q/final they shown on Grandstand.
                        I was not aware of this. I was under the impression only edited highlights of the final (Reardon/Miles) that was televised.

                        Oh well you learn something new everyday..
                        "Statistics won't tell you much about me. I play for love, not records."

                        ALEX HIGGINS

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally Posted by spike View Post
                          I was not aware of this. I was under the impression only edited highlights of the final (Reardon/Miles) that was televised.
                          You haven't you seen the highlights of this game on the archive video then? It only lasts 3-4 minutes but good to see.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            No I haven't unfortunately. Would like to though..
                            "Statistics won't tell you much about me. I play for love, not records."

                            ALEX HIGGINS

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally Posted by The Statman View Post
                              Here are the scores of the 1974 championship, in case you are interested.
                              That's brilliant TS! How many pre-Crucible Championships have you managed to do in this format now?

                              I like how this thread is titled 1973 WC but we've now moved on a year.

                              Interesting to note the century breaks for that years tournament:

                              131 Graham Miles
                              110 Graham Miles
                              102 Marcus Owen
                              101 Graham Miles
                              100 John Dunning
                              Last edited by Cyril; 21 October 2010, 10:54 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X