Me and my mates were playing doubles tonight (not IRL, but online at VP4). The "referee" (the computer) called a foul on a particular shot, and replays suggested that the cue ball had jumped (but just barely) one red, on its way to the object ball. Fair enough. That's a foul. A discussion then ensued, about real life snooker, and about the refs NOT calling fouls on certain close jump shots. Someone then posted this old video of Bill W. and a miraculous fluke...(see link below) and the question arose: Was this a foul? The white left the table, then landed and bounced again...seemingly over the green ball.
Questions...
1...Did the white "jump" the green? Was it in fact a foul that was not called? Or did it not jump the green at all?
2...If in fact the white did go "over" the green, is the rule in effect, or does the rule cease to be relevant after that first bounce?
Thanks all for you comments. Here's the shot in question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgBfkjkpZcc
*sorry, don't know how to activate hyperlink...please copy and paste
Questions...
1...Did the white "jump" the green? Was it in fact a foul that was not called? Or did it not jump the green at all?
2...If in fact the white did go "over" the green, is the rule in effect, or does the rule cease to be relevant after that first bounce?
Thanks all for you comments. Here's the shot in question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgBfkjkpZcc
*sorry, don't know how to activate hyperlink...please copy and paste
Comment