Pool vs snooker
This old chestnut has always been argued about, who is better at what. To me it seems obvious, people that play snooker, and people that play pool are the same race of people. They both has the same physiology, two arms, two legs (usually). People develop according to experience that they have. My experience is in snooker. I find pool a bit wierd. To go from one to the other (and be good) means you have to play both quite a bit. I think saying that one player is beter than the other is like comparing oranges and apples.
For me one thing is for sure though technically snooker is more advanced. You can't get away with some of the arm reving and shoulder dropping at the top level. Also snooker is played on a far bigger table so your faced with more tougher pots.
Back to the initial question; IMO practicing pool is better than not playing at all, but going back to snooker will be wierd after to start with.
This old chestnut has always been argued about, who is better at what. To me it seems obvious, people that play snooker, and people that play pool are the same race of people. They both has the same physiology, two arms, two legs (usually). People develop according to experience that they have. My experience is in snooker. I find pool a bit wierd. To go from one to the other (and be good) means you have to play both quite a bit. I think saying that one player is beter than the other is like comparing oranges and apples.
For me one thing is for sure though technically snooker is more advanced. You can't get away with some of the arm reving and shoulder dropping at the top level. Also snooker is played on a far bigger table so your faced with more tougher pots.
Back to the initial question; IMO practicing pool is better than not playing at all, but going back to snooker will be wierd after to start with.
Comment