maybe thats the point if he had missed the brown/blue or pink then questions wouldnt have been raised. could it be that was his plan all along miss the black and cause a bit of controversy.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why did Ronnie O Sullivan deliberately lose his match in CHina open?
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by Monique View PostI'm just asking for a tad of common sense regarding that shot and its circumstances.
But I think more accurate way of describing the Black is more a gamble, with say 50% of him wanting it to go in because it's still a sport, the other 50% of him hoping it doesn't because he's how he is. So he played a slow roll, where fate would decide his future on this, if the nap pulls a little or slows up to the pocket - he would know certainly it would be game over. But there was a chance it might trickle in.
That gamble wouldn't work on the Brown/Blue/Pink as much.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Monique View PostWhat makes no sense is this: suppose you want to lose and be out and back home , OK?... your long game's been dire for 2-3 seasons with success rates around 25% in most matches; you face a long brown... and yet you pot it, you then pot the blue, gain position on the pink, pot it, gain perfect position on the black and miss it deliberately in such a blatant way it will necessarily raise questions and maybe get you in trouble. Would you do that? Even the most stupid person wouldn't, it just makes no sense.
I'm just asking for a tad of common sense regarding that shot and its circumstances.
Blatant sounds much more like Ronnie, doesn't it?
And doesn't sound like Ronnie to be thinking in advance what kind of reaction his actions are going to raise.
Illogical, blatant, careless about outcome. Deliberate.Last edited by ore; 2 April 2010, 01:15 PM.Co-winner of Spike’s 2009 UK Championship number of centuries prediction contest.
RIP Noel. RIP.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by JayDee View PostBut I think more accurate way of describing the Black is more a gamble, with say 50% of him wanting it to go in because it's still a sport, the other 50% of him hoping it doesn't because he's how he is. So he played a slow roll, where fate would decide his future on this, if the nap pulls a little or slows up to the pocket - he would know certainly it would be game over. But there was a chance it might trickle in.
The thread is answered.Co-winner of Spike’s 2009 UK Championship number of centuries prediction contest.
RIP Noel. RIP.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Matthew01 View PostThis thing isn't as silly as it sounds, I've never seen Ronnie play with a huge watch on his wrist, you only see Hendry with an expensive kettle on. There's definitely something wrong here, this looks well crooked to me and had it happened in a UK tournament maybe there'd be some kind of inquest.S.P.I.L.F.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by JayDee View PostBut I think more accurate way of describing the Black is more a gamble, with say 50% of him wanting it to go in because it's still a sport, the other 50% of him hoping it doesn't because he's how he is. So he played a slow roll, where fate would decide his future on this, if the nap pulls a little or slows up to the pocket - he would know certainly it would be game over. But there was a chance it might trickle in.
He is a man, with unreal level of talent, but bitterly tested in the world by his differently working brain. Perhaps, he is the one that we all should be like, as we're all doing it wrong and can't see the consequences of our acts.
So, instead of calling it Ronnie and his thoughts abnormal, I'm calling everybody on the world's ideas illogical and looking to the world from the point of view he is. HopefullyAll the way Mark J!!
I understand nothing from snooker. - Dedicated to jrc750!
Winner of the German Masters 2011 Lucky Dip
Comment
-
Originally Posted by ncyaa View PostIllegal sport betting in China is huge and there is no doubt it has influenced sporting events in China. Even the chief of the Chinese FA was arrested for receiving bribes for match fixing.
Comment
-
That's from one betting forum:
according to the chinese media sina, during the mid session interval (2:2 on the scoreline), ronnie asked Anda Zhang abt the fight information and told him he'd on the next flight home with him. I believe anda trained in ronnie's club and travelled to china on the same flight in the first place.
SINA's usually reliable but sometimes tells ********. From the betting point of view, i cannot see there's any dodge betting involved as I was betting on the match and the market reacted as it should be (before that thing happens of course), maybe he just misses home "Co-winner of Spike’s 2009 UK Championship number of centuries prediction contest.
RIP Noel. RIP.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Monique View PostWhat makes no sense is this: suppose you want to lose and be out and back home , OK?... your long game's been dire for 2-3 seasons with success rates around 25% in most matches; you face a long brown... and yet you pot it, you then pot the blue, gain position on the pink, pot it, gain perfect position on the black and miss it deliberately in such a blatant way it will necessarily raise questions and maybe get you in trouble. Would you do that? Even the most stupid person wouldn't, it just makes no sense.
Again, I'm not challenging the fact that Ronnie didn't play as he should have to try and win the match; he didn't and he deserves to be criticised for that certainly. I'm just asking for a tad of common sense regarding that shot and its circumstances.I saw that going differently in my mind
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Monique View PostWhat makes no sense is this: suppose you want to lose and be out and back home , OK?... your long game's been dire for 2-3 seasons with success rates around 25% in most matches; you face a long brown... and yet you pot it, you then pot the blue, gain position on the pink, pot it, gain perfect position on the black and miss it deliberately in such a blatant way it will necessarily raise questions and maybe get you in trouble. Would you do that? Even the most stupid person wouldn't, it just makes no sense.
Again, I'm not challenging the fact that Ronnie didn't play as he should have to try and win the match; he didn't and he deserves to be criticised for that certainly. I'm just asking for a tad of common sense regarding that shot and its circumstances.
Comment
Comment