Originally Posted by ferret
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
snooker balls to cover a full size table!
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by The Statman View Post2,430
Yes, it's the unnecessary gaps between the double-rows!
If we move the double-rows as close as possible, there is room for another double-row and one more row! It makes a nice table:
The details show that there isn't room for additional balls at the pocket openings:
So my answer is 2633.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by ferret View PostForgive me I been down the pub all night that is where the questions came from to start with, my next question is how much would all the balls weigh and could a snooker table handle that weight?
or, in old money: 822.6lb
or 58 stone and 10.5lb for those of us on this side of the atlantic.
or nearly three Bill Werbenuiks simultaneously enjoying a trouser splitting moment.
Comment
-
Originally Posted by csmarkus View PostAs always, a very thorough post but this time I think there is a small mistake in the calculation. One can spot it looking at these pictures showing Statman's solution:
Yes, it's the unnecessary gaps between the double-rows!
If we move the double-rows as close as possible, there is room for another double-row and one more row!
You are of course quite right.
Comment
-
And some are lazy.Robbo's potting is so good he doesn't need to bother with positional play like the rest of the players. He laughs in the face of those who spend hours on the practice table perfecting their cue ball control! ~ Forman
2009 Grand Prix Fantasy Game winner
Comment
Comment