I have just looked back and, for those of you who have nothing better to do on a sunny Friday afternoon, here is the thread from two years ago.
The input of Peter Rook, an experienced referee with great input into the 1995 rulebook rewrite, is a particularly useful and informative.
But I would recommend that the thread be read from the start - the post by davis greatest on 1.2.09 at 5:31pm GMT, and wildJONESEYE's post immediately following, show the two sides of the argument perfectly - what the rule actually says and the opposite which we all know is what should happen.
I think, also, that an extra part of the Rules which might be usefully added, is that the referee will call the break score after every stroke, signifying that the previous stroke has been completed and the following stroke can commence.
There is nothing currently in the Rules suggesting that the referee has to call any break scores, apart from announcement of the penalties for a foul.
The input of Peter Rook, an experienced referee with great input into the 1995 rulebook rewrite, is a particularly useful and informative.
But I would recommend that the thread be read from the start - the post by davis greatest on 1.2.09 at 5:31pm GMT, and wildJONESEYE's post immediately following, show the two sides of the argument perfectly - what the rule actually says and the opposite which we all know is what should happen.
I think, also, that an extra part of the Rules which might be usefully added, is that the referee will call the break score after every stroke, signifying that the previous stroke has been completed and the following stroke can commence.
There is nothing currently in the Rules suggesting that the referee has to call any break scores, apart from announcement of the penalties for a foul.
Comment