Tv decisions in snooker???????

[debs]

No offence to me. And what's all this "not entitled to comment" rubbish? Jeez!

Ok Mr Cheerful awfully glad i did not offend.

Jeez some people eh what am i like.

[The Statman]

Ok well maybe I'm having a bad day (in fact, I am!). I've made more than 5000 posts to this forum and I don't think I've offended anybody yet. But I can see that my tone above is a bit over-the-top so I'd like to apologies to you for that.

I shall return on a better day.

[debs]

Ok well maybe I'm having a bad day (in fact, I am!). I've made more than 5000 posts to this forum and I don't think I've offended anybody yet. But I can see that my tone above is a bit over-the-top so I'd like to apologies to you for that.

I shall return on a better day.

I get it you know your stuff and i think i exasperated you. Hope your day improves if i could find a smilely i'd give you a smile.

[arbitrage]

"then the referee would give the benefit of doubt to the striker". the referee flip-flopped on his decision - hence the investigation by the authorities into the matter

sure, while hawkeye may not be used as extensively in snooker as it is in tennis - the current technology employed is not sufficient - and there can be middle ground somewhere. the fact that the snooker governing body has not tried to upgrade the technology employed nor the rules of the game is a detraction to the sport in general

[the montrealer]

Hi what they should do when two balls are close to each other say a red and a colour it should be called a foul to avoid decisions on split hits and player loses points

[kellydouglas]

I think if the decision had to be deferred then the players should have been allowed to take decision about TV footage.