Casual game at the seniors club the other day and i was asked to judge whether there was a touching ball. When I looked it seemed to be touching but something seemed wrong. These old eyes are not what they used to be so I carry a folding 10x magnifier so got it out and looked and there was a very slight gap (maybe 1/20 mm) except that there was a piece of dirt bridging the gap between the balls. Should I have said touching or was I right in deciding that the dirt should not count in determining 'touching ball'?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Touching Ball??
Collapse
X
-
Hmmm, I'm not sure there's a definitive right answer to this one.
I think that, if I was refereeing, if there was any physical contact between the two balls (even caused by the speck of dirt) then I'd call a touching ball. Who's to say that if that the speck of dirt isn't preventing a normal touching ball situation?
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Souwester View PostWho's to say that if that the speck of dirt isn't preventing a normal touching ball situation?
Comment
Comment